Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510220›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and preoperative predictive factors.

Giuseppe Di Buono, Giorgio Romano, Massimo Galia, Giuseppe Amato, Elisa Maienza, Federica Vernuccio, Giulia Bonventre, Leonardo Gulotta, Salvatore Buscemi, Antonino Agrusa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giuseppe Di BuonoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè, 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy. giuseppe.dibuono@unipa.it.
Giorgio RomanoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè, 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Massimo GaliaDepartment of Radiology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe AmatoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè, 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Elisa MaienzaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè, 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Federica VernuccioDepartment of Radiology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Giulia BonventreDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè, 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Leonardo GulottaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè, 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Salvatore BuscemiDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè, 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Antonino AgrusaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Via L. Giuffrè, 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard technique for treatment of gallbladder disease. In case of acute cholecystitis we can identify preoperative factors associated with an increased risk of conversion and intraoperative complications. The aim of our study was to detect preoperative laboratory and radiological findings predictive of difficult LC with potential advantages for both the surgeons and patients in terms of options for management. We designed a retrospective case-control study to compare preoperative predictive factors of difficult LC in patients treated in emergency setting between January 2015 and December 2019. We included in the difficult LC group the surgeries with operative time > 2 h, need for conversion to open, significant bleeding and/or use of synthetic hemostats, vascular and/or biliary injuries and additional operative procedures. We collected 86 patients with inclusion criteria and difficult LC. In the control group, we selected 86 patients with inclusion criteria, but with no operative signs of difficult LC. The analysis of the collected data showed that there was a statistically significant association between WBC count and fibrinogen level and difficult LC. No association were seen with ALP, ALT and bilirubin values. Regarding radiological findings significant differences were noted among the two groups for irregular or absent wall, pericholecystic fluid, fat hyperdensity, thickening of wall > 4 mm and hydrops. The preoperative identification of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy provides an important advantage not only for the surgeon who has to perform the surgery, but also for the organization of the operating block and technical resources. In patients with clinical and laboratory parameters of acute cholecystitis, therefore, it would be advisable to carry out a preoperative abdominal CT scan with evaluation of features that can be easily assessed also by the surgeon.

Indexed as

AgedBiliary Tract DiseasesCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33510220
PMCPMC7844234
OpenAlexW3121405544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.