Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The consequences of COVID-19 on social interactions: an online study on face covering.

Marta Calbi, Nunzio Langiulli, Francesca Ferroni, Martina Montalti, Anna Kolesnikov, Vittorio Gallese, Maria Alessandra Umiltà

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Limited Effect of Masking During COVID-19 Pandemic on ADOS-2 Algorithm Scores in Toddlers With and Without Autism.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Introducing IOSScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Marta CalbiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. marta.calbi@unipr.it.
Nunzio LangiulliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Francesca Ferroni *Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Martina Montalti *Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Anna KolesnikovDepartment of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Vittorio GalleseDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Maria Alessandra UmiltàDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed the nature of our social interactions. In order to understand how protective equipment and distancing measures influence the ability to comprehend others' emotions and, thus, to effectively interact with others, we carried out an online study across the Italian population during the first pandemic peak. Participants were shown static facial expressions (Angry, Happy and Neutral) covered by a sanitary mask or by a scarf. They were asked to evaluate the expressed emotions as well as to assess the degree to which one would adopt physical and social distancing measures for each stimulus. Results demonstrate that, despite the covering of the lower-face, participants correctly recognized the facial expressions of emotions with a polarizing effect on emotional valence ratings found in females. Noticeably, while females' ratings for physical and social distancing were driven by the emotional content of the stimuli, males were influenced by the "covered" condition. The results also show the impact of the pandemic on anxiety and fear experienced by participants. Taken together, our results offer novel insights on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social interactions, providing a deeper understanding of the way people react to different kinds of protective face covering.

Indexed as

MasksSocial InteractionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19Facial ExpressionFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33510195
PMCPMC7844002
OpenAlexW3123137331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.