Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510090›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2021

Graphene oxide-composited chitosan scaffold contributes to functional recovery of injured spinal cord in rats.

Bing Yang, Pang-Bo Wang, Ning Mu, Kang Ma, Shi Wang, Chuan-Yan Yang, Zhong-Bing Huang, Ying Lai, Hua Feng, Guang-Fu Yin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Spinal cord injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bing YangCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Pang-Bo WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Ning MuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Kang MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Shi WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Chuan-Yan YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Zhong-Bing HuangCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Ying LaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Hua FengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Guang-Fu YinCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Tu-Nan ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Chen-Shi HuCollege of Biomedical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Army Medical University · CNSouthwest Hospital · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study illustrates that graphene oxide nanosheets can endow materials with continuous electrical conductivity for up to 4 weeks. Conductive nerve scaffolds can bridge a sciatic nerve injury and guide the growth of neurons; however, whether the scaffolds can be used for the repair of spinal cord nerve injuries remains to be explored. In this study, a conductive graphene oxide composited chitosan scaffold was fabricated by genipin crosslinking and lyophilization. The prepared chitosan-graphene oxide scaffold presented a porous structure with an inner diameter of 18-87 μm, and a conductivity that reached 2.83 mS/cm because of good distribution of the graphene oxide nanosheets, which could be degraded by peroxidase. The chitosan-graphene oxide scaffold was transplanted into a T9 total resected rat spinal cord. The results show that the chitosan-graphene oxide scaffold induces nerve cells to grow into the pores between chitosan molecular chains, inducing angiogenesis in regenerated tissue, and promote neuron migration and neural tissue regeneration in the pores of the scaffold, thereby promoting the repair of damaged nerve tissue. The behavioral and electrophysiological results suggest that the chitosan-graphene oxide scaffold could significantly restore the neurological function of rats. Moreover, the functional recovery of rats treated with chitosan-graphene oxide scaffold was better than that treated with chitosan scaffold. The results show that graphene oxide could have a positive role in the recovery of neurological function after spinal cord injury by promoting the degradation of the scaffold, adhesion, and migration of nerve cells to the scaffold. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Research at the First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) (approval No. AMUWEC20191327) on August 30, 2019.

Indexed as

angiogenesischitosanelectrical conductiongraphene oxideregenerationrepairscaffoldspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID33510090
PMCPMC8328790
OpenAlexW3125838552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.