Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33509266›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Patient handover between ambulance crew and healthcare professionals in Icelandic emergency departments: a qualitative study.

Sveinbjörn Dúason, Björn Gunnarsson, Margrét Hrönn Svavarsdóttir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation and analysis of clinical outcome prediction for trauma patients based on machine learning.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026
    Article
  3. Chinese expert consensus on the prehospital management of major trauma.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sveinbjörn DúasonUniversity of Akureyri, School of Health Sciences, Norðurslóð 2, 600, Akureyri, Iceland. sduason@simnet.is.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-9003
Björn GunnarssonAkureyri Hospital, Akureyri, Iceland.
Margrét Hrönn SvavarsdóttirUniversity of Akureyri, School of Health Sciences, Norðurslóð 2, 600, Akureyri, Iceland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbulance services play an important role in the healthcare system when it comes to handling accidents or acute illnesses outside of hospitals. At the time of patient handover from emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to the nurses and physicians in emergency departments (EDs), there is a risk that important information will be lost, the consequences of which may adversely affect patient well-being. The study aimed to describe healthcare professionals' experience of patient handovers between ambulance and ED staff and to identify factors that can affect patient handover quality.

methodsThe Vancouver School's phenomenological method was used. The participants were selected using purposive sampling from a group of Icelandic EMTs, nurses, and physicians who had experience in patient handovers. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted and were supported by an interview guide. The participants included 17 EMTs, nurses, and physicians. The process of patient handover was described from the participants' perspectives, including examples of communication breakdown and best practices.

resultsFour main themes and nine subthemes were identified. In the theme of leadership, the participants expressed that it was unclear who was responsible for the patient and when during the process the responsibility was transferred between healthcare professionals. The theme of structured framework described the communication between healthcare professionals before patient's arrival at the ED, upon ED arrival, and a written patient report. The professional competencies theme covered the participants' descriptions of professional competences in relation to education and training and attitudes towards other healthcare professions and patients. The collaboration theme included the importance of effective teamwork and positive learning environment.

conclusionsA lack of structured communication procedures and ambiguity about patient responsibility in patient handovers from EMTs to ED healthcare professionals may compromise patient safety. Promoting accountability, mitigating the diffusion of responsibility, and implementing uniform practices may improve patient handover practices and establish a culture of integrated patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationDocumentationHumansIcelandInterprofessional RelationsInterviews as TopicLeadershipPatient HandoffProfessional CompetenceSampling StudiesAmbulance servicesEmergency departmentHealthcare professionalsInterdisciplinary communicationPatient handoverQualitative researchResponsibility

Identifiers

PMID33509266
PMCPMC7842055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.