Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33509258›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol.

Charlotte Paterson, Caleb Leduc, Margaret Maxwell, Birgit Aust, Benedikt L Amann, Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja, Evelien Coppens, Chrisje Couwenbergh, Cliodhna O'Connor, Ella Arensman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Mental Health in Construction Industry: A Global Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Workplace-Based Interventions for Mental Health in Africa: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Protective and Vulnerability Factors of Municipal Workers' Mental Health: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Charlotte PatersonNMAHP-RU, University of Stirling, . charlotte.paterson@stir.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6796-227X
Caleb LeducSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Margaret MaxwellNMAHP-RU, University of Stirling.
Birgit AustNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Benedikt L AmannCentro Forum Research Unit, Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addicions (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Autonomous University Barcelona, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.
Arlinda Cerga-PashojaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Evelien CoppensCentre for Health Research and Consultancy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Chrisje CouwenberghKenniscentrum Phrenos, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Cliodhna O'ConnorSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ella ArensmanSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Birgit A GreinerSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health problems are common in the working population and represent a growing concern internationally, with potential impacts on workers, organisations, workplace health and compensation authorities, labour markets and social policies. Workplace interventions that create workplaces supportive of mental health, promote mental health awareness, destigmatise mental illness and support those with mental disorders are likely to improve health and economical outcomes for employees and organisations. Identifying factors associated with successful implementation of these interventions can improve intervention quality and evaluation, and facilitate the uptake and expansion. Therefore, we aim to review research reporting on the implementation of mental health promotion interventions delivered in workplace settings, in order to increase understanding of factors influencing successful delivery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted incorporating a stepwise methodology to identify relevant literature reviews, primary research and grey literature. This review is registered with Research Registry (reviewregistry897). One reviewer will conduct the search to identify English language studies in the following electronic databases from 2008 through to July 1, 2020: Scopus, PROSPERO, Health Technology Assessments, PubMed, Campbell Collaboration, Joanna Briggs Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL and Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). Reference searching, Google Scholar, Grey Matters, IOSH and expert contacts will be used to identify grey literature. Two reviewers will screen title and abstracts, aiming for 95% agreement, and then independently screen full texts for inclusion. Two reviewers will assess methodological quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extract and synthesize data in line with the RE-AIM framework, Nielson and Randall's model of organisational-level interventions and Moore's sustainability criteria, if the data allows. We will recruit and consult with international experts in the field to ensure engagement, reach and relevance of the main findings. DISCUSSION: This will be the first systematic scoping review to identify and synthesise evidence of barriers and facilitators to implementing mental health promotion interventions in workplace settings. Our results will inform future evaluation studies and randomised controlled trials and highlight gaps in the evidence base. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Research Registry ( reviewregistry897 ).

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthDelivery of Health CareHealth PromotionHumansScoping Reviews as TopicWorkplaceBarriers and facilitatorsImplementation scienceMental health promotionOrganisational interventionsProcess evaluationRE-AIMScoping reviewWellbeing promotionWorkplaceWorkplace interventions

Identifiers

PMID33509258
PMCPMC7844910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.