Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33509210›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2021

National and subnational coverage and inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and sanitary health interventions in Ecuador: a comparative study between 1994 and 2012.

Paulina Rios Quituizaca, Giovanna Gatica-Domínguez, Devaki Nambiar, Jair Licio Ferreira Santos, Stefan Brück, Luis Vidaletti Ruas, Aluisio J D Barros

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Paulina Rios QuituizacaCentral University of Ecuador, Faculty of Medicine, Quito, Ecuador. paulina.riosq@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1597-3812
Giovanna Gatica-DomínguezInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5284-2654
Devaki NambiarThe George Institute for Global Health, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5682-6109
Jair Licio Ferreira SantosRiberao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo. FMRP-USP, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7367-4418
Stefan BrückCentral University of Ecuador, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quito, Ecuador.
Luis Vidaletti RuasInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2022-8729
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRCentral University of Ecuador · ECGeorge Institute for Global Health · INUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/16/1/502653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatin America (LA) has experienced constant economic and political crises that coincide with periods of greater inequality. Between 1996 and 2007 Ecuador went through one of the greatest political and socio-economic crises in Latin America, a product of neo-liberal economic growth strategies. Between 2007 and 2012 it regained political stability, promoted redistributive policies, and initiated greater social spending. To understand the possible influence on the political and economic context, we analyzed the coverage and inequalities in five Reproductive, Maternal, and Child Health (RMNCH) and two water and sanitation interventions using survey data from a broad time window (1994-2012), at a national and subnational level.

methodsThe series cross-sectional study used data from four representative national health surveys (1994, 1999, 2004 and 2012). Coverage of RMNCH and sanitary interventions were stratified by wealth quintiles (as a measure of the socio-economic level), urban-rural residence and the coverage for each province was mapped. Mean difference, Theil index and Variance-weighted least squares regression were calculated to indicate subnational and temporal changes.

resultsFrom 1994 to 2004, Ecuador evidenced large inequalities whose reduction becomes more evident in 2012. Coverage in RMNCH health service-related interventions showed a rather unequal distribution among the socioeconomic status and across provinces in 1994 and 2004, compared to 2012. Sanitary interventions on the contrary, showed the most unequal interventions, and failed to improve or even worsened in several provinces. While there is a temporary improvement also at the subnational level, in 2012 several provinces maintain low levels of coverage.

conclusionsThe remarkable reduction of inequalities in coverage of RMNCH interventions in 2012 clearly coincides with periods of regained political stability, promoted redistributive policies, and greater social spending, different from the former neo-liberal reforms which is consistent with observations made in other Latin American countries. Territorial heterogeneity and great inequalities specially related with sanitation interventions persists. It is necessary to obtain high quality information with sharper geographic desegregation that allows to identify and understand local changes over time. This would help to prioritize intervention strategies, introduce multisectoral policies and investments that support local governments.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesMaternal-Child Health ServicesReproductive Health ServicesSanitationChildCross-Sectional StudiesEcuadorFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsContinuity of patient careCross- sectional studiesHealthcare disparitiesHealth care surveysMaternal- child health servicesReproductive health servicesSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID33509210
PMCPMC7842066
OpenAlexW3122436305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.