Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33509098›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Use of a technology-based system to motivate older adults in performing physical activity: a feasibility study.

Els Knippenberg, Annick Timmermans, Steven Palmaers, Annemie Spooren

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04489563 nacompletednot on this map

Intelligent Activity-based Client-centred Training (i-ACT) in Aged Persons

TypeinterventionalSponsorPXL University CollegeRan2017 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsFeasibility of a Technology-based System in Aged PersonArmsi-ACT
NCT05162040 completednot on this map

PedaleoVR: Credibility, Usability and Intrinsic Motivation Study of a Virtual Reality Application for Lower Limb Motor Rehabilitation

TypeobservationalSponsorWerium Assistive SolutionsRan2021 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsAtaxia, Motor, HemiparesisArmsUse of PedaleoVR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Experiences of technology for increasing physical activity of older adults: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Els KnippenbergDepartment of Healthcare, Centre of Expertise - Innovation in Care, PXL University College of Applied Sciences and Arts, Guffenslaan 39, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium. els.knippenberg@pxl.be.ORCID 0000-0002-9676-8633
Annick TimmermansFaculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, REVAL, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building A, Hasselt University, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Steven PalmaersDepartment of Digital, Centre of Expertise - SMART-ICT, PXL University College of Applied Sciences and Arts, Elfde-Liniestraat 24, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.
Annemie SpoorenDepartment of Healthcare, Centre of Expertise - Innovation in Care, PXL University College of Applied Sciences and Arts, Guffenslaan 39, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium.
Hogeschool PXL · BEHasselt University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintaining or initiating regular physical activity (PA) is important for successful aging. Technology-based systems may support and stimulate older adults to initiate and persevere in performing PA. The aim of the current study was to assess to which extent a customised Kinect system is 1) a credible tool to increase PA in older adults, 2) motivating to perform PA by older adults, and 3) easy to be used in older adults.

methodsA mixed-method cross-sectional feasibility study was performed in 5 aged care facilities in Flanders, Belgium. Aged participants were asked to perform a 20-30 min test with the intelligent Activity-based Client-centred Training (i-ACT) system. After the test, the 'Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire' (CEQ), the 'Intrinsic Motivation Inventory'(IMI), the System Usability Scale (SUS), and semi-structured interviews were conducted in the older adults. Feedback was gathered using the thinking aloud method in both aged participants and healthcare professionals.

resultsA total of 48 older adults (20 males and 28 females, mean age = 81.19 (SD = 8.10)), were included. The scores pertaining to system credibility and expectancy, system usability, and motivation towards use were moderate to good. Participants reported that they liked using the i-ACT system, but that the context could be more attractive by adding more visualisations. Twelve professionals stated that they observed involvement in older adults but think that i-ACT is better used in day care centres.

conclusionsThis study indicates that i-ACT is a usable and motivational system to engage older adults to perform PA and therefore supports successful aging. Future research is necessary to investigate the efficacy of i-ACT to perform PA and the transfer to regain and/or maintain engagement in ADLs that older adults find meaningful and purposeful at an older age. Also, further development of i-ACT is advisable to adapt the i-ACT system towards implementation at the home of older adults.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov ID NCT04489563 , 23 July 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

ExerciseTechnologyAgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleClient-centredOlder adultsPhysical activityTechnology

Identifiers

PMID33509098
PMCPMC7841896
OpenAlexW3125119398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.