Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33508423›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2021

Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: what is realistic, what are illusions? Part 2: a discussion of chemical and biological data.

Andreas Bender, Isidro Cortes-Ciriano

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial intelligence-assisted lead optimization in drug discovery: bridging computational advances and translational challenges.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas BenderCentre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK; Imaging and Data Analytics, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: ab454@cam.ac.uk.
Isidro Cortes-CirianoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK. Electronic address: icortes@ebi.ac.uk.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Artificial Intelligence' (AI) has recently had a profound impact on areas such as image and speech recognition, and this progress has already translated into practical applications. However, in the drug discovery field, such advances remains scarce, and one of the reasons is intrinsic to the data used. In this review, we discuss aspects of, and differences in, data from different domains, namely the image, speech, chemical, and biological domains, the amounts of data available, and how relevant they are to drug discovery. Improvements in the future are needed with respect to our understanding of biological systems, and the subsequent generation of practically relevant data in sufficient quantities, to truly advance the field of AI in drug discovery, to enable the discovery of novel chemistry, with novel modes of action, which shows desirable efficacy and safety in the clinic.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoveryBiomedical ResearchHumansKnowledge BasesTranslational Science, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID33508423
PMCPMC8132984
OpenAlexW3125539506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.