Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33508320›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry

Structural basis of fast- and slow-severing actin-cofilactin boundaries.

Glen M Hocky, Charles V Sindelar, Wenxiang Cao, Gregory A Voth, Enrique M De La Cruz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Twist response of actin filaments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Single-molecule analysis of actin filament debranching by cofilin and GMF.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Glen M HockyDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: hockyg@nyu.edu.
Charles V SindelarDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Wenxiang CaoDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Gregory A VothDepartment of Chemistry, Chicago Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, and James Franck Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Enrique M De La CruzDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. Electronic address: enrique.delacruz@yale.edu.
Yale University · USChicago Institute for Psychoanalysis · USNew York University · US

Funding

Actin filament mechanics and branched network turnoverR35GM136656 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ENRIQUE M DE LA CRUZ · 2020 to 2026
$4.0M
Harnessing simulations to uncover molecular mechanisms of mechanosensingR35GM138312 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Glen Hocky · 2020 to 2026
$3.0M
Structural basis of motility by dimeric kinesin motor proteinsR01GM110530 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SINDELAR, CHARLES VAUGHN · 2014 to 2023
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110530NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136656NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the ADF/cofilin family of regulatory proteins bind actin filaments cooperatively, locally change actin subunit conformation and orientation, and sever filaments at "boundaries" between bare and cofilin-occupied segments. A cluster of bound cofilin introduces two distinct classes of boundaries due to the intrinsic polarity of actin filaments, one at the "pointed" end side and the other at the "barbed" end-side of the cluster; severing occurs more readily at the pointed end side of the cluster ("fast-severing" boundary) than the barbed end side ("slow-severing" boundary). A recent electron-cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM) model of the slow-severing boundary revealed structural "defects" at the interface that potentially contribute to severing. However, the structure of the fast-severing boundary remains uncertain. Here, we use extensive molecular dynamics simulations to produce atomic resolution models of both severing boundaries. Our equilibrated simulation model of the slow-severing boundary is consistent with the cryo-EM structural model. Simulations indicate that actin subunits at both boundaries adopt structures intermediate between those of bare and cofilin-bound actin subunits. These "intermediate" states have compromised intersubunit contacts, but those at the slow-severing boundary are stabilized by cofilin bridging interactions, accounting for its lower fragmentation probability. Simulations where cofilin proteins are removed from cofilactin filaments favor a mechanism in which a cluster of two contiguously bound cofilins is needed to fully stabilize the cofilactin conformation, promote cooperative binding interactions, and accelerate filament severing. Together, these studies provide a molecular-scale foundation for developing coarse-grained and theoretical descriptions of cofilin-mediated actin filament severing.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActin Depolymerizing FactorsActinsAnimalsChickensHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProtein SubunitsRabbitsActin Depolymerizing FactorsActinsProtein Subunitsactincofilincomputer modelingmolecular dynamicssevering

Identifiers

PMID33508320
PMCPMC7961102
OpenAlexW3121954630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.