Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33508256›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental research2021

The use of dried blood spots for characterizing children's exposure to organic environmental chemicals.

Dana Boyd Barr, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Yuxia Cui, Lori Merrill, Lauren M Petrick, John D Meeker, Timothy R Fennell, Elaine M Faustman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Determinants of maternal and neonatal PFAS concentrations: a review.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advancing Exposomic Research in Prenatal Respiratory Disease Programming.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  17. Multiomics to elucidate inflammatory bowel disease risk factors and pathways.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Dana Boyd BarrEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: dbbarr@emory.edu.
Kurunthachalam KannanDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Yuxia CuiNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Lori MerrillWestat, Rockville, MD, USA.
Lauren M PetrickThe Senator Frank R. Lautenberg Environmental Health Sciences Laboratory, Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
John D MeekerSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Timothy R FennellRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Elaine M FaustmanUniversity of Washington, School of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emory University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNew York University · USRTI International · USTriangle · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Washington · USWestat (United States) · US

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sheela Sathyanarayana · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Untargeted Analysis ResourceU2CES026561 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WRIGHT, ROBERT O · 2015 to 2025
$24.5M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES019776 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI William Michael Caudle · 2013 to 2026
$22.6M
The Mount Sinai Transdisciplinary Center on Early Environmental ExposuresP30ES023515 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Manish Arora · 2014 to 2026
$21.3M
Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
Wadsworth Center's Human Health and Exposure Analysis Resource (WC-HHEAR)U2CES026542 · NIEHS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI KANNAN, KURUNTHACHALAM, KANNAN, KURUNTHACHALAM · 2015 to 2025
$15.6M
Human Health Exposure Analysis Resource (HHEAR): Coordinating CenterU24ES026539 · NIEHS · WESTAT, INC. · PI MERRILL, LORI · 2015 to 2025
$10.8M
Untargeted Analysis ResourceU2CES026553 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MEEKER, JOHN D. · 2015 to 2015
$9.5M
National Exposure Assessment Laboratory at EmoryU2CES026560 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WALLER, LANCE A · 2015 to 2015
$8.3M
Untargeted Analysis ResourceU2CES030857 · NIEHS · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI DU, XIUXIA, FENNELL, TIMOTHY RAYMOND · 2019 to 2025
$8.1M
Untargeted Analysis Research ResourceU2CES026544 · NIEHS · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI FENNELL, TIMOTHY RAYMOND · 2015 to 2018
$3.7M
Evaluation and Validation of Dried Blood Spots as Matrix for Exposure AssessmentR21ES023927 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BARR, DANA BOYD · 2014 to 2015
$427k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES019776NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES023515NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES023927NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES026539NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026542NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026544NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026553NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026560NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES026561NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES030857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomonitoring is a commonly used tool for exposure assessment of organic environmental chemicals with urine and blood samples being the most commonly used matrices. However, for children's studies, blood samples are often difficult to obtain. Dried blood spots (DBS) represent a potential matrix for blood collection in children that may be used for biomonitoring. DBS are typically collected at birth to screen for several congenital disorders and diseases; many of the states that are required to collect DBS archive these spots for years. If the archived DBS can be accessed by environmental health researchers, they potentially could be analyzed to retrospectively assess exposure in these children. Furthermore, DBS can be collected prospectively in the field from children ranging in age from newborn to school-aged with little concern from parents and minimal risk to the child. Here, we review studies that have evaluated the measurement of organic environmental toxicants in both archived and prospectively collected DBS, and where available, the validation procedures that have been performed to ensure these measurements are comparable to traditional biomonitoring measurements. Among studies thus far, the amount of validation has varied considerably with no studies systematically evaluating all parameters from field collection, shipping and storage contamination and stability to laboratory analysis feasibility. These validation studies are requisite to ensure reliability of the measurement and comparability to more traditional matrices. Thus, we offer some recommendations for validation studies and other considerations before DBS should be adopted as a routine matrix for biomonitoring.

Indexed as

Biological MonitoringOrganic ChemicalsChildDried Blood Spot TestingEnvironmental ExposureHumansInfant, NewbornReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesOrganic ChemicalsBiomonitoringChildrenDried blood spotsNonpersistent organic pollutantsOrganic toxicantsPersistent organic pollutants

Identifiers

PMID33508256
PMCPMC7988293
OpenAlexW3122345142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.