Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33508219›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

A sex-specific switch between visual and olfactory inputs underlies adaptive sex differences in behavior.

Tetsuya Nojima, Annika Rings, Aaron M Allen, Nils Otto, Thomas A Verschut, Jean-Christophe Billeter, Megan C Neville, Stephen F Goodwin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Organization and evolution of sex-biased gene expression inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High-resolution single-cell analyses reveal evolutionary constraints and evolvability of sexual circuits inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sexually-dimorphic neurons in theResearch square · 2025
    Article
  11. Sexually-dimorphic neurons in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. High-resolution comparative single-cell transcriptomics ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tetsuya NojimaCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK.
Annika RingsCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK.
Aaron M AllenCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK.
Nils OttoCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK.
Thomas A VerschutGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jean-Christophe BilleterGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Megan C NevilleCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK. Electronic address: megan.goodwin@cncb.ox.ac.uk.
Stephen F GoodwinCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK. Electronic address: stephen.goodwin@cncb.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T001348/1NIH HHS P40 OD018537Wellcome Trust 106189/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 203261/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 209235/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although males and females largely share the same genome and nervous system, they differ profoundly in reproductive investments and require distinct behavioral, morphological, and physiological adaptations. How can the nervous system, while bound by both developmental and biophysical constraints, produce these sex differences in behavior? Here, we uncover a novel dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster that allows deployment of completely different behavioral repertoires in males and females with minimum changes to circuit architecture. Sexual differentiation of only a small number of higher order neurons in the brain leads to a change in connectivity related to the primary reproductive needs of both sexes-courtship pursuit in males and communal oviposition in females. This study explains how an apparently similar brain generates distinct behavioral repertoires in the two sexes and presents a fundamental principle of neural circuit organization that may be extended to other species.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBrainCourtshipFemaleMaleNeuronsOvipositionPhotic StimulationSexual Behavior, AnimalSmellVision, Ocularadaptive sex differencescourtshipDrosophilaegg layingsex-specific neuronssexual behaviorsexually dimorphic neuronstracking

Identifiers

PMID33508219
PMCPMC7987718
OpenAlexW3124230387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.