ArticlePloS one2021
Antagonistic maternal and direct effects of the leptin receptor gene on body weight in pigs.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leptin receptor gene influences pig gut microbiota both through feed intake and independently.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Evaluating regional heritability mapping methods for identifying QTLs in a wild population of Soay sheep.Heredity · 2025Article
- Association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and production traits in pigs.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- Maternal effects and its importance in the genetic evaluations of preweaning live weight traits of beef cattle. A review.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Review
- Candidate markers for enhanced host response to PRRS have scarce adverse effects on pigs' growth and production.Porcine health management · 2024Article
- Impact of the leptin receptor gene on pig performance and quality traits.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Identification of breed-specific genomic variants in Colombian Creole pig breeds by whole-genome sequencing.Tropical animal health and production · 2023Article
- Genome-wide analyses reveal a strong association between LEPR gene variants and body fat reserves in ewes.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Heritability and genetic correlation estimates of semen production traits with litter traits and pork production traits in purebred Duroc pigs.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Genetic architecture and major genes for backfat thickness in pig lines of diverse genetic backgrounds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maternal effects on offspring growth can impact survival and evolution of natural and domesticated populations. Genetic correlation estimates often support a negative relationship between direct and maternal effects. However, the genetic underpinnings whereby this antagonism operates are unclear. In pigs, sow feeding status and body composition condition piglet development and growth. We hypothesized that variants in genes impacting these traits may be causative of maternal influences that could be antagonistic to the direct effects for piglet growth. A recessive missense mutation (C>T) in the porcine leptin receptor (LEPR) gene (rs709596309) has been identified as the possible causal polymorphism for increased feed intake and fatness. Using data from a Duroc line, we show that the TT sows exerted a negative impact on the body weight of their offspring at the end of the growing period of similar extent to the positive direct effect of the TT genotype over each individual. Thus, TT pigs from TT dams were about as heavy as CC and CT (C-) pigs from C-dams, but TT pigs from C-dams were around 5% heavier than C-pigs from TT dams. In contrast, body composition was only influenced by LEPR direct effects. This antagonism is due to a higher propensity of TT pigs for self-maintenance rather than for offspring investment. We show that TT pigs consumed more feed, favored fatty acid uptake over release, and produced lighter piglets at weaning than their C-counterparts. We conclude that LEPR underlies a transgenerational mechanism for energy distribution that allocates resources to the sow or the offspring according to whether selective pressure is exerted before or after weaning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.