Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33508028›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards rabies: A survey of the general population residing in the Harare Metropolitan Province of Zimbabwe.

Reverend M Spargo, Andre Coetzer, Francis T Makuvadze, Sylvester M Chikerema, Vaida Chiwerere, Esnath Bhara, Louis H Nel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Reverend M SpargoDivision of Epidemiology and Disease Control, Department of Veterinary Services, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Andre CoetzerDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0581-7207
Francis T MakuvadzeDepartment of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Sylvester M ChikeremaDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Vaida ChiwerereDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Esnath BharaDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Studies, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Louis H NelDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
University of Zimbabwe · ZWUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRabies remains endemic to the Harare Metropolitan Province of Zimbabwe, with a lack of public participations potentially contributing to the limited success in eliminating the disease. We hypothesized that rabies intervention campaigns were less successful than they could be as a result of poor understanding of the disease at the community level, and thus aimed to identify the knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards rabies in the province.

methodsA cross-sectional survey, using a semi-structured questionnaire, was implemented between January 2017 and June 2018 across the province and data were collected from 798 respondents. Frequency distributions and logistic regressions were undertaken to determine the factors associated with the adequacy of the prevailing rabies knowledge, pet ownership characteristics and the existing preventative practices.

resultsThe results of our study suggested that the majority of the respondents (92%) had heard of rabies. However, the level of rabies knowledge could be classified as "adequate" in only 36% of respondents. The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that pet ownership and type of occupation were statistically associated with a better understanding and knowledge of the disease. Off all the respondents, 49% owned at least one dog or cat and suburb density and occupation were statistically associated with owning a pet. Amongst the pet owners, 57% consulted an animal health practitioner at least once a year and 75% were aware of a rabies vaccine for their pets. The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age, education and gender were statistically associated with pet owners taking their pet(s) to an animal clinic.

conclusionThis study showed that the majority of the respondents lacked comprehensive knowledge about rabies, with the knowledge pertaining to health seeking behaviour and the importance of rabies vaccination being the most lacking. Additional public education relying on key messages, aimed at the different target audiences, is required in the province.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePetsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAnimalsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRabiesRabies VaccinesZimbabweRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID33508028
PMCPMC7842990
OpenAlexW3123682232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.