Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33508016›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Diagnostic performance of a rapid whole blood-based RT-LAMP method for malaria diagnosis among apparently healthy blood donors and febrile neonates in Cameroon.

Sylvie Georgette Zebaze Temgoua Kemleu, Laure Ngando, Elvige Nguekeng, Balotin Fogang, Marie Mafo Kapen, Styve Iruch Fopa, Marie Florence Biabi, Estelle Essangui, Jules Clement Assob Nguedia, Lawrence Ayong

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvie Georgette Zebaze Temgoua KemleuMalaria Research Unit, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Laure NgandoBacteriology Unit, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Elvige NguekengUniversity Teaching Hospital (CHU), Yaounde, Cameroon.
Balotin FogangMalaria Research Unit, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Marie Mafo KapenMalaria Research Unit, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Styve Iruch FopaUniversity Teaching Hospital (CHU), Yaounde, Cameroon.
Marie Florence BiabiMalaria Research Unit, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Estelle EssanguiMalaria Research Unit, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Jules Clement Assob NguediaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Lawrence AyongMalaria Research Unit, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Yaounde, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0001-7717-4832
Centre Pasteur du Cameroun · CMUniversity of Buea · CMUniversity Teaching Hospital of Yaounde · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests are the two commonly used methods for malaria diagnosis that rely on the direct use of unprocessed blood samples. However, both methods do not have the level of sensitivity required for malaria diagnosis in cases of low density parasitaemia. We report here the diagnostic performance of a whole blood-based reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for Plasmodium falciparum malaria diagnosis in apparently healthy blood donors and febrile neonates in Cameroon. The presence of malaria parasites in whole blood samples was determined by light microscopy, antigen-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT), and by RT-LAMP using a "lyse and amplify" experimental protocol. Of the 256 blood donors tested, 36 (14.1%) were positive for malaria parasites by light microscopy, 38 (14.8%) were positive by RDT whereas 78 (30.5%) were positive by RT-LAMP. Only light microscopy and RT-LAMP detected infection among the febrile neonates (279 neonates, median age: 2 days, range: 1-9 days), with positivity rates of 8.6% and 12.2%, respectively. The overall concordance between the three methods were 75.9% for RT-LAMP and light microscopy, 75.1% for RT-LAMP and RDT, and 83.9% for light microscopy and RDT. Blood parasite densities were significantly lower in the neonates (mean: 97.6, range: 61-192 parasites/μL) compared to the blood donors (mean: 447.8, range: 63-11 000 parasites/μL). Together, the study demonstrates the usefulness of whole blood RT-LAMP for use in rapid pre-screening of blood donors and suspected neonates to avert severe consequences of P. falciparum infections.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsMalaria, FalciparumMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAdultCameroonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePlasmodium falciparum

Identifiers

PMID33508016
PMCPMC7842973
OpenAlexW3124125018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.