Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507907›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

The need for supportive mental wellbeing interventions in bladder cancer patients: A systematic review of the literature.

Agustina Bessa, Elke Rammant, Deborah Enting, Richard T Bryan, Muhammad Shamim Khan, Sachin Malde, Rajesh Nair, Ramesh Thurairaja, Fidelma Cahill, Suzanne Amery and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Designing a Pragmatic Intervention to Help Improve the Bladder Cancer Patient Experience.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Psychological Impact of Bladder Cancer: Insights from 219 Patients and Caregivers in Indonesia Using DASS-21 (2019-2023).Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  8. Mental Health in Urologic Oncology.Health psychology research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Agustina BessaSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7196-2280
Elke RammantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Deborah EntingSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard T BryanBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Muhammad Shamim KhanBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Sachin MaldeBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Rajesh NairBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Ramesh ThurairajaBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Fidelma CahillSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Suzanne AmeryBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Sue SmithDept. of Psychology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Kamran AhmedBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Beth RussellSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte MossSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kathryn ChattertonBladder Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Christel HäggströmDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mieke Van HemelrijckSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is an increased awareness of the effect of a bladder cancer diagnosis and its treatments on the mental wellbeing of patients. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of interventions to improve this mental wellbeing. This systematic review is the first phase of the Medical Research Council Framework for developing complex interventions and provides an overview of the published mental wellbeing interventions that could be used to design an intervention specific for BC patients.

methodsThis review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in January 2019 and studies were identified by conducting searches for Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ovid Gateway. All included studies met the following criteria: mental wellbeing interventions of adults with medically confirmed diagnosis of any type of urological cancer, reported outcomes for specific HRQoL domains including psychological factors. The quality of evidence was assessed according to Down and Black 27-item checklist.

resultsA total of 15,094 records were collected from the literature search and 10 studies matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of these, nine interventions were for patients with prostate cancer and one for patients with kidney cancer. No studies were found for other urological cancers. Depression was the most commonly reported endpoint measured. Of the included studies with positive efficacy, three were group interventions and two were couple interventions. In the group interventions, all showed a reduction in depressive symptoms and in the couple interventions, there was a reduction in depressive symptoms and a favourable relationship cohesion. The couple interventions were the most feasible and acceptable, but further research was required for most of the studies.

conclusionWhile awareness of the importance of mental wellbeing in bladder cancer patients is growing, this systematic literature review highlights the gap of feasible and acceptable interventions for this patient population.

Indexed as

Mental HealthHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33507907
PMCPMC7842965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.