Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507815›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2021

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

Larissa A Korde, Mark R Somerfield, Lisa A Carey, Jennie R Crews, Neelima Denduluri, E Shelley Hwang, Seema A Khan, Sibylle Loibl, Elizabeth A Morris, Alejandra Perez and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07643584 (DEMAND - A Phase II Trial of De-Escalation of Axillary Management in Advanced Nodal Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 614 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
614citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
55.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07643584 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

DEMAND - A Phase II Trial of De-Escalation of Axillary Management in Advanced Nodal Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2026 to 2031Enrolled120ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAxillary Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

614 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 947 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exercise and pathologic complete response to cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Prospective comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review

554 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Larissa A KordeClinical Investigations Branch, CTEP, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Mark R SomerfieldAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0001-5372-0085
Lisa A CareyUniversity of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-2388-4649
Jennie R CrewsSeattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA.
Neelima DenduluriUS Oncology Network, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Arlington, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-6809
E Shelley HwangDuke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-0204-2012
Seema A KhanNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-6307-2023
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6488-4958
Elizabeth A MorrisMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Alejandra PerezSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Plantation, FL.
Meredith M ReganDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-2428-6109
Patricia A SpearsUniversity of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
Preeti K SudheendraMD Anderson Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ.ORCID 0000-0001-7778-5430
W Fraser SymmansMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-1526-184X
Rachel L YungSeattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0001-9142-7656
Brittany E HarveyAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-4444-1452
Dawn L HershmanHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-8807-153X
American Society of Clinical Oncology · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USCooper University Health Care · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDuke University · USGerman Breast group · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USNorthwestern University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Miami · USVirginia Cancer Specialists · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

methodsASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and provide recommended care options.

resultsA total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS: Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisSystematic Reviews as TopicAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID33507815
PMCPMC8274745
OpenAlexW3122861570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.