Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507795›Full record

ArticlePsychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy2021

Americans' distress early in the COVID-19 pandemic: Protective resources and coping strategies.

Crystal L Park, Lucy Finkelstein-Fox, Beth S Russell, Michael Fendrich, Morica Hutchison, Jessica Becker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The self-reported impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological health of U.S. Air Force cyber personnel.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A latent profile analysis of the COVID-19 Stressors Scale.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Crystal L ParkDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-6572-7321
Lucy Finkelstein-FoxDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-7799-9164
Beth S RussellDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Michael FendrichSchool of Social Work, University of Connecticut.
Morica HutchisonDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Jessica BeckerSchool of Social Work, University of Connecticut.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

Emotion Regulation Interventions for Preventing Collegiate Escalations in Drinking: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Establish Acceptability, Feasibility and Preliminary EfficacyR34AA027455 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI FENDRICH, MICHAEL, PARK, CRYSTAL L. · 2019 to 2021
$694k
NIAAA NIH HHS R34 AA027455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe rapid emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States has dramatically altered daily life and taken a toll on Americans' physical, mental, social, and financial well-being. Based on previous widespread disasters, future high prevalence of short- and long-term adverse mental health consequences are anticipated. Studies of COVID-19 outside the United States indicated moderately high levels of distress, but we have little information regarding Americans' distress nor the factors associated with relative distress or adjustment during this unprecedented time. This study represents the first national view of Americans' distress during the massive disruption of COVID-19 and identifies levels of stress exposure, protective psychosocial resources, and coping strategies.

methodData were collected April 7-9, 2020 from an online platform, using best practices for ensuring high-quality data; 1,015 completed respondents are included ([53.9%] women; average age = 38.9 years; mostly White [82.4%] and non-Hispanic [91.5%]). Respondents' locations ranged across the United States, from 18.5% in the Northeast to 37.8% in the South.

resultsFairly high levels of stress exposure and peritraumatic and general distress (depression, anxiety, and stress) were reported. Emotion regulation skills along with active and distraction coping emerged as the strongest predictors of lower distress levels.

conclusionsThese results identify potential targets for online mental health interventions-focusing on engaging in adaptive emotion regulation and coping (e.g., through telehealth mental health first aid)-during the pandemic to offset the likely rise in distress over the months ahead. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Mental HealthPandemicsPsychological DistressAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33507795
PMCPMC8448577
OpenAlexW3124402999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.