Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507615›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Detection of abnormal left ventricular geometry in patients without cardiovascular disease through machine learning: An ECG-based approach.

Eleni Angelaki, Maria E Marketou, Georgios D Barmparis, Alexandros Patrianakos, Panos E Vardas, Fragiskos Parthenakis, Giorgos P Tsironis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An ECG-Based Model for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Detection: A Machine Learning Approach.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Survey and Evaluation of Hypertension Machine Learning Research.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleni AngelakiInstitute of Theoretical and Computational Physics and Department of Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4152-9627
Maria E MarketouDepartment of Cardiology, Heraklion University Hospital, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1888-3430
Georgios D BarmparisInstitute of Theoretical and Computational Physics and Department of Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Alexandros PatrianakosDepartment of Cardiology, Heraklion University Hospital, Heraklion, Greece.
Panos E VardasDepartment of Cardiology, Heraklion University Hospital, Heraklion, Greece.
Fragiskos ParthenakisDepartment of Cardiology, Heraklion University Hospital, Heraklion, Greece.
Giorgos P TsironisInstitute of Theoretical and Computational Physics and Department of Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac remodeling is recognized as an important aspect of cardiovascular disease (CVD) progression. Machine learning (ML) techniques were applied to basic clinical parameters and electrocardiographic features, in order to detect abnormal left ventricular geometry (LVG) even before the onset of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), in a population without established CVD. The authors enrolled 528 patients with and without essential hypertension, but no other indications of CVD. All patients underwent a full echocardiographic evaluation and were classified into 3 groups; normal geometry (NG), concentric remodeling without LVH (CR), and LVH. Abnormal LVG was identified as increased relative wall thickness (RWT) and/or left ventricular mass index (LVMi). The authors trained supervised ML models to classify patients with abnormal LVG and calculated SHAP values to perform feature importance and interaction analysis. Hypertension, age, body mass index over the Sokolow-Lyon voltage, QRS-T angle, and QTc duration were some of the most important features. Our model was able to distinguish NG from CR+LVH combined, with 87% accuracy on an unseen test set, 75% specificity, 97% sensitivity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC/ROC) equal to 0.91. The authors also trained our model to classify NG and CR (NG + CR) against those with LVH, with 89% test set accuracy, 93% specificity, 67% sensitivity, and an AUC/ROC value of 0.89, for a 0.4 decision threshold. Our ML algorithm effectively detects abnormal LVG even at early stages. Innovative solutions are needed to improve risk stratification of patients without established CVD, and ML may enable progress in this direction.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionElectrocardiographyHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularMachine Learningelectrocardiogramhypertensionhypertrophymachine learningremodeling

Identifiers

PMID33507615
PMCPMC8678829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.