Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507556›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2021

No association between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers prior to hospital admission and clinical course of COVID-19 in the COvid MEdicaTion (COMET) study.

Roos S G Sablerolles, Freija E F Hogenhuis, Melvin Lafeber, Bob P A van de Loo, Sander D Borgsteede, Eric Boersma, Jorie Versmissen, Hugo van der Kuy, COMET Research Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roos S G SablerollesDepartments of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6647-6584
Freija E F HogenhuisHospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2942-9471
Melvin LafeberDepartments of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7061-6415
Bob P A van de LooDigitalis Rx BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3822-7898
Sander D BorgsteedeDepartment of Clinical Decision Support, Health Base Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8425-6139
Eric BoersmaCardiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2559-7128
Jorie VersmissenDepartments of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-7765
Hugo van der KuyHospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7128-8801
COMET Research Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, also known as COVID-19, conflicting theories have circulated on the influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) on incidence and clinical course of COVID-19, but data are scarce. The COvid MEdicaTion (COMET) study is an observational, multinational study that focused on the clinical course of COVID-19 (i.e. hospital mortality and intensive care unit [ICU] admission), and included COVID-19 patients who were registered at the emergency department or admitted to clinical wards of 63 participating hospitals. Pharmacists, clinical pharmacologists or treating physicians collected data on medication prescribed prior to admission. The association between the medication and composite clinical endpoint, including mortality and ICU admission, was analysed by multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for potential confounders. A total of 4870 patients were enrolled. ACEi were used by 847 (17.4%) patients and ARB by 761 (15.6%) patients. No significant association was seen with ACEi and the composite endpoint (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 1.12), mortality (OR 1.03; 95%CI 0.84 to 1.27) or ICU admission (OR 0.96; 95%CI 0.78 to 1.19) after adjustment for covariates. Similarly, no association was observed between ARB and the composite endpoint (OR 1.09; 95%CI 0.90 to 1.30), mortality (OR 1.12; OR 0.90 to 1.39) or ICU admission (OR 1.21; 95%CI 0.98 to 1.49). In conclusion, we found no evidence of a harmful or beneficial effect of ACEi or ARB use prior to hospital admission on ICU admission or hospital mortality.

Indexed as

COVID-19HypertensionAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsHospitalsHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor Antagonistsangiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorangiotensin II receptor blockerCOVID-19mortalitySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33507556
PMCPMC8014637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.