Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507519›Full record

SynthesisBrain imaging and behavior2021

Idiopathic and acquired pedophilia as two distinct disorders: an insight from neuroimaging.

Cristina Scarpazza, Livio Finos, Sarah Genon, Laura Masiero, Elena Bortolato, Camilla Cavaliere, Jessica Pezzaioli, Merylin Monaro, Nicolò Navarin, Umberto Battaglia and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain imaging and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristina ScarpazzaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 25131, Padova, PD, Italy. cristina.scarpazza@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4126-426X
Livio FinosDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Sarah GenonInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Laura MasieroDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Elena BortolatoDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Camilla CavaliereDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Jessica PezzaioliDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Merylin MonaroDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 25131, Padova, PD, Italy.
Nicolò NavarinDepartment of Mathematics "Tullio Levi-Civita", University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Umberto BattagliaDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Pietro PietriniMolecular Mind Lab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Stefano FerracutiDepartment of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SartoriDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 25131, Padova, PD, Italy.
Andrea S Camperio CianiDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
University of Padua · ITIMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pedophilia is a disorder of public concern because of its association with child sexual offense and recidivism. Previous neuroimaging studies of potential brain abnormalities underlying pedophilic behavior, either in idiopathic or acquired (i.e., emerging following brain damages) pedophilia, led to inconsistent results. This study sought to explore the neural underpinnings of pedophilic behavior and to determine the extent to which brain alterations may be related to distinct psychopathological features in pedophilia. To this aim, we run a coordinate based meta-analysis on previously published papers reporting whole brain analysis and a lesion network analysis, using brain lesions as seeds in a resting state connectivity analysis. The behavioral profiling approach was applied to link identified regions with the corresponding psychological processes. While no consistent neuroanatomical alterations were identified in idiopathic pedophilia, the current results support that all the lesions causing acquired pedophilia are localized within a shared resting state network that included posterior midlines structures, right inferior temporal gyrus and bilateral orbitofrontal cortex. These regions are associated with action inhibition and social cognition, abilities that are consistently and severely impaired in acquired pedophiles. This study suggests that idiopathic and acquired pedophilia may be two distinct disorders, in line with their distinctive clinical features, including age of onset, reversibility and modus operandi. Understanding the neurobiological underpinnings of pedophilic behavior may contribute to a more comprehensive characterization of these individuals on a clinical ground, a pivotal step forward for the development of more efficient therapeutic rehabilitation strategies.

Indexed as

PedophiliaSex OffensesBrainChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingAcquired pedophiliaBehavioral profilingCoordinate based meta‐analysisIdiopathic pedophiliaLesion network analysisNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID33507519
PMCPMC8500885
OpenAlexW3125335778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.