Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507473›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

The influence of depth of anesthesia and blood pressure on muscle recorded motor evoked potentials in spinal surgery. A prospective observational study protocol.

Sebastiaan E Dulfer, M M Sahinovic, F Lange, F H Wapstra, D Postmus, A R E Potgieser, C Faber, R J M Groen, A R Absalom, G Drost

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastiaan E DulferDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. s.e.dulfer@umcg.nl.
M M SahinovicDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
F LangeDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
F H WapstraDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
D PostmusDepartment of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
A R E PotgieserDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
C FaberDepartment of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
R J M GroenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
A R AbsalomDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
G DrostDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For high-risk spinal surgeries, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is used to detect and prevent intraoperative neurological injury. The motor tracts are monitored by recording and analyzing muscle transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials (mTc-MEPs). A mTc-MEP amplitude decrease of 50-80% is the most common warning criterion for possible neurological injury. However, these warning criteria often result in false positive warnings. False positives may be caused by inadequate depth of anesthesia and blood pressure on mTc-MEP amplitudes. The aim of this paper is to validate the study protocol in which the goal is to investigate the effects of depth of anesthesia (part 1) and blood pressure (part 2) on mTc-MEPs. Per part, 25 patients will be included. In order to investigate the effects of depth of anesthesia, a processed electroencephalogram (pEEG) monitor will be used. At pEEG values of 30, 40 and 50, mTc-MEP measurements will be performed. To examine the effect of blood pressure on mTc-MEPs the mean arterial pressure will be elevated from 60 to 100 mmHg during which mTc-MEP measurements will be performed. We hypothesize that by understanding the effects of depth of anesthesia and blood pressure on mTc-MEPs, the mTc-MEP monitoring can be interpreted more reliably. This may contribute to fewer false positive warnings. By performing this study after induction and prior to incision, this protocol provides a unique opportunity to study the effects of depths of anesthesia and blood pressure on mTc-MEPs alone with as little confounders as possible. Trial registration number NL7772.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaEvoked Potentials, MotorBlood PressureHumansMusclesNeurosurgical ProceduresObservational Studies as TopicBlood pressureDepth of anesthesiaIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoringMotor evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID33507473
PMCPMC8497310
OpenAlexW3122042860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.