Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507433›Full record

ArticleOdontology2021

The antimicrobial effect of different ozone protocols applied in severe curved canals contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis: ex vivo study.

Mariana Montagner Moraes, Marcelo Santos Coelho, Wayne Martins Nascimento, Carlos Goes Nogales, Francisco Ubiratan Ferreira de Campos, Adriana de Jesus Soares, Marcos Frozoni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana Montagner MoraesEndodontic Department São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Marcelo Santos CoelhoEndodontic Department São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Campinas, SP, Brazil. coelho_marcelo@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7429-4967
Wayne Martins NascimentoEndodontic Department São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Goes NogalesUniversity of São Paulo, USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco Ubiratan Ferreira de CamposEndodontic Department São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Adriana de Jesus SoaresState University of Campinas, Unicamp, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Marcos FrozoniEndodontic Department São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry, Rua José Rocha Junqueira 13, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic · BRHospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate 3 different irrigation protocols using ozone on monoculture biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis. Fifty disto-buccal roots of maxillary first molars were instrumented up to the size 25.08, sterilized and then incubated with Enterococcus faecalis for 21 days for biofilm maturation in the root canal walls. After contamination, the initial collection (S1) was performed and the 50 samples were divided in 3 experimental groups (n = 15) and 1 positive control group (n = 5) as follows: Group1: Ozonated water (40 µg/ml); Group2: gaseous ozone (40 µg/ml); Group3: Ozonated water (40 µg/ml) under continuous ultrasonic irrigation (CUI) and, Group 4: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (positive control). The final collection (S2) was performed using hedstroem files # 25 by scraping the root canal wall and absorbed paper cone. The collected samples were analyzed by CFU/ml count and qPCR. To compare the effect of irrigation methods and to investigate E. faecalis count data, Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon nonparametric tests were used at p < 05. The values of the differences between the S1 values and the S2 values revealed that the groups did not differ significantly for either E. faecalis CFU count data (p = 0.713) or q-PCR (p = 0.185), however, it is observed that for all groups, the CFU count of E. faecalis decreased over 99%. For the q-PCR assay, the reduction was on the order of 74-95%. Only the NaOCl positive control group presented total elimination of CFU/mL bacterial counting. The ozone protocols assessed were similar in regard to Enterococcus faecalis reduction.

Indexed as

Enterococcus faecalisOzoneDental Pulp CavityRoot Canal IrrigantsSodium HypochloriteOzoneRoot Canal IrrigantsSodium HypochloriteBiofilmDisinfectionEnterococcus faecalisOzoneRoot canal treatmentSodium hypochlorite

Identifiers

PMID33507433
OpenAlexW3125291444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.