Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507429›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2021

Monosynaptic inference via finely-timed spikes.

Jonathan Platkiewicz, Zachary Saccomano, Sam McKenzie, Daniel English, Asohan Amarasingham

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan Platkiewicz *Department of Mathematics, The City College of New York, The City University of New York, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
Zachary Saccomano *Department of Biology, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Sam McKenzieNeuroscience Institute, New York University, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Daniel EnglishSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24060, USA.
Asohan AmarasinghamDepartment of Mathematics, The City College of New York, The City University of New York, New York, NY, 10031, USA. aamarasingham@ccny.cuny.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0722-0538

Funding

CRNCS: Identification and Plasticity of Neuronal MicrocircuitsR01MH102840 · NIMH · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI AMARASINGHAM, ASOHAN · 2013 to 2015
$1.2M
Investigation into the synaptic origins of hippocampal replayK99MH118423 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MCKENZIE, SAMUEL ARNOLD · 2018 to 2019
$264k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observations of finely-timed spike relationships in population recordings have been used to support partial reconstruction of neural microcircuit diagrams. In this approach, fine-timescale components of paired spike train interactions are isolated and subsequently attributed to synaptic parameters. Recent perturbation studies strengthen the case for such an inference, yet the complete set of measurements needed to calibrate statistical models is unavailable. To address this gap, we study features of pairwise spiking in a large-scale in vivo dataset where presynaptic neurons were explicitly decoupled from network activity by juxtacellular stimulation. We then construct biophysical models of paired spike trains to reproduce the observed phenomenology of in vivo monosynaptic interactions, including both fine-timescale spike-spike correlations and firing irregularity. A key characteristic of these models is that the paired neurons are coupled by rapidly-fluctuating background inputs. We quantify a monosynapse's causal effect by comparing the postsynaptic train with its counterfactual, when the monosynapse is removed. Subsequently, we develop statistical techniques for estimating this causal effect from the pre- and post-synaptic spike trains. A particular focus is the justification and application of a nonparametric separation of timescale principle to implement synaptic inference. Using simulated data generated from the biophysical models, we characterize the regimes in which the estimators accurately identify the monosynaptic effect. A secondary goal is to initiate a critical exploration of neurostatistical assumptions in terms of biophysical mechanisms, particularly with regards to the challenging but arguably fundamental issue of fast, unobservable nonstationarities in background dynamics.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsAction PotentialsModels, StatisticalIntegrate-and-fire neuronNoise modelsNonstationaritySpike correlogramSynaptic connectivitySynchrony

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.