Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507419›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2021

Translation and cultural adaptation of IPOS (integrated palliative care outcome scale) in Estonia.

Merli Laissaar, Riina Hallik, Pille Sillaste, Ulvi Ragun, Mari-Leen Pärn, Kaiu Suija

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Merli LaissaarTallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086, Tallinn, Estonia. merli.laissaar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2945-2153
Riina HallikTallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086, Tallinn, Estonia.
Pille SillasteNorth Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, J. Sütiste tee 19, 13419, Tallinn, Estonia.
Ulvi RagunTartu University Hospital, L. Puusepa 1a, 50406, Tartu, Estonia.
Mari-Leen PärnTartu University Hospital, L. Puusepa 1a, 50406, Tartu, Estonia.
Kaiu SuijaTartu University Hospital, L. Puusepa 1a, 50406, Tartu, Estonia.
Tartu University Hospital · EETallinn University of Technology · EENorth Estonia Medical Centre · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are questionnaires that could be used in palliative care (PC) to evaluate patient well-being and monitor their care. PROMs enable a focus on what is important to patients by putting the patient at the center of care. Adapting an existing PROM requires considering cultural differences, general usability and understandability of translated terms.

aimTo translate and culturally adapt both the patient and staff three and seven day versions of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) into Estonian. The IPOS consist of 10 questions (staff versions 9 questions) and 17 close ended items. The sub aim is to describe the differences and discrepancies found during the adaptation process and compare the results with previous research.

methodsThe translation and adaptation process of IPOS was conducted using recommended guidelines consisting of six phases and included cognitive interviews with patients (n = 11) and palliative care multidisciplinary team members (n = 8). The study was conducted in two major Estonian hospitals.

resultsThe Estonian IPOS demonstrated face and content validity, acceptance by patients and staff. As a result of expert group review and cognitive interviews with patients and staff, 9 semantic changes were implemented.

conclusionsPatient and staff versions of the IPOS with a recall of 3 or 7 days were translated and culturally adapted for Estonia. The Estonian IPOS four versions are ready for use in Estonia.

Indexed as

EstoniaIPOSPalliative carePatient reported outcomePatient-reported outcome measure

Identifiers

PMID33507419
PMCPMC7841376
OpenAlexW3124362081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.