Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507412›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2021

Eccentric Strength Assessment of Hamstring Muscles with New Technologies: a Systematic Review of Current Methods and Clinical Implications.

João Gustavo Claudino, Carlos Alberto Cardoso Filho, Natália Franco Netto Bittencourt, Luiz Gilherme Gonçalves, Crislaine Rangel Couto, Roberto Chiari Quintão, Guilherme Fialho Reis, Otaviano de Oliveira Júnior, Alberto Carlos Amadio, Daniel Boullosa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

João Gustavo ClaudinoSchool of Physical Education and Sport - Laboratory of Biomechanics, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello de Morais, 65 - Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-030, Brazil. claudinojgo@usp.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0263-8118
Carlos Alberto Cardoso FilhoSchool of Physical Education and Sport - Laboratory of Biomechanics, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello de Morais, 65 - Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-030, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-9397
Natália Franco Netto BittencourtUni-BH University Center - Physical Therapy Department, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7683-9270
Luiz Gilherme GonçalvesPhysiology Department, Botafogo Futebol Clube, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1281-3853
Crislaine Rangel CoutoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3305-3208
Roberto Chiari QuintãoMedical Department, Clube Atlético Mineiro, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9264-8872
Guilherme Fialho ReisMedical Department, Clube Atlético Mineiro, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9522-0986
Otaviano de Oliveira JúniorMedical Department, Clube Atlético Mineiro, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7766-9974
Alberto Carlos AmadioSchool of Physical Education and Sport - Laboratory of Biomechanics, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello de Morais, 65 - Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-030, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2527-2163
Daniel BoullosaSport and Exercise Science, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8477-127X
Júlio Cerca SerrãoSchool of Physical Education and Sport - Laboratory of Biomechanics, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello de Morais, 65 - Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-030, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3646-3387
Universidade de São Paulo · BRCentro Universitário de Belo Horizonte · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the severe economic and performance implications of hamstring injuries, there are different attempts to identify their risk factors for subsequently developing injury prevention strategies to reduce the risk of these injuries. One of the strategies reported in the scientific literature is the application of interventions with eccentric exercises. To verify the effectiveness of these interventions, different eccentric strength measurements have been used with low-cost devices as alternatives to the widespread used isokinetic dynamometers and the technically limited handheld dynamometers. Therefore, the purpose of the present systematic review was to summarize the findings of the scientific literature related to the evaluation of eccentric strength of hamstring muscles with these new technologies.

methodsSystematic searches through the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, from inception up to April 2020, were conducted for peer reviewed articles written in English, reporting eccentric strength of hamstrings assessed by devices, different to isokinetic and handheld dynamometers, in athletes.

resultsSeventeen studies were finally included in the review with 4 different devices used and 18 parameters identified. The pooled sample consisted of 2893 participants (97% male and 3% female: 22 ± 4 years). The parameters most used were peak force (highest and average), peak torque (average and highest), and between-limb imbalance (left-to-right limb ratio). There is inconsistency regarding the association between eccentric hamstrings strength and both injury risk and athletic performance. There is no standardized definition or standardization of the calculation of the used parameters.

conclusionsThe current evidence is insufficient to recommend a practical guide for sports professionals to use these new technologies in their daily routine, due to the need for standardized definitions and calculations. Furthermore, more studies with female athletes are warranted. Despite these limitations, the eccentric strength of hamstring muscles assessed by different devices may be recommended for monitoring the neuromuscular status of athletes.

Indexed as

Athletic performanceFlywheelKnee flexorsMuscle injuryNeuromuscular statusNordBordScreeningStrain

Identifiers

PMID33507412
PMCPMC7843797
OpenAlexW3206731539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.