Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33507401›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2021

Evaluation for Parkinsonian Bradykinesia by deep learning modeling of kinematic parameters.

Dong Jun Park, Jun Woo Lee, Myung Jun Lee, Se Jin Ahn, Jiyoung Kim, Gyu Lee Kim, Young Jin Ra, Yu Na Cho, Weui Bong Jeong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Research progress in motor assessment of neurodegenerative diseases driven by motion capture data].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dong Jun ParkSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jun Woo LeeDivision of Energy and Electric Engineering, Uiduk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.
Myung Jun LeePusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Gudeok-ro 179, Seo-gu, Busan, 49241, Republic of Korea. mslayer9@gmail.com.
Se Jin AhnDivision of Energy and Electric Engineering, Uiduk University, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea.
Jiyoung KimPusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Gudeok-ro 179, Seo-gu, Busan, 49241, Republic of Korea.
Gyu Lee KimDepartment of Family Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Young Jin RaDepartment of Family Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Yu Na ChoDepartment of Neurology, Haeundae Bumin Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Weui Bong JeongSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wearable sensor system is available for monitoring of bradykinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), however, it remains unclear whether kinematic parameters would reflect clinical severity of PD, or would help clinical diagnosis of physicians. The present study investigated whether the classification model using kinematic parameters from the wearable sensor may show accordance with clinical rating and diagnosis in PD patients. Using the Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) sensor, we measured the movement of finger tapping (FT), hand movements (HM), and rapid alternating movements (RA) in 25 PD patients and 21 healthy controls. Through the analysis of the measured signal, 11 objective features were derived. In addition, a clinician who specializes in movement disorders viewed the test video and evaluated each of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. In all items of FT, HM, RA, the correlation between the linear regression score obtained through objective features (angle, period, coefficient variances for angle and period, change rates of angle and period, angular velocity, total angle, frequency, magnitude, and frequency × magnitude) and the clinician's UPDRS score was analyzed, and there was a significant correlation (rho > 0.7, p < 0.001). PD patients and controls were classified by deep learning using objective features. As a result, it showed a high performance with an area under the curve (AUC) about as high as 0.9 (FT Total = 0.950, HM Total = 0.889, RA Total = 0.888, ALL Total = 0.926. This showed similar performance to the classification result of binary logistic regression and neurologist, and significantly higher than that of family medicine specialists. Our results suggest that the deep learning model using objective features from the IMU sensor can be usefully used to identify and evaluate bradykinesia, especially for general physicians not specializing in neurology.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHypokinesiaBiomechanical PhenomenaHandHumansMovementDeep learningInertial measurement units (IMU) sensorObjective featuresParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.