ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2021
Evaluation for Parkinsonian Bradykinesia by deep learning modeling of kinematic parameters.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Inertial Measurement Units in Medicine: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Pooled it
- Internet of Things Technologies and Machine Learning Methods for Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis, Monitoring and Management: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Estimating motor symptom presence and severity in Parkinson's disease from wrist accelerometer time series using ROCKET and InceptionTime.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- [Research progress in motor assessment of neurodegenerative diseases driven by motion capture data].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Neurological Diseases Using Biomechanical and Gait Analysis Data: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Deep Clinical Phenotyping of Parkinson's Disease: Towards a New Era of Research and Clinical Care.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Assessment of movement disorders using wearable sensors during upper limb tasks: A scoping review.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wearable sensor system is available for monitoring of bradykinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), however, it remains unclear whether kinematic parameters would reflect clinical severity of PD, or would help clinical diagnosis of physicians. The present study investigated whether the classification model using kinematic parameters from the wearable sensor may show accordance with clinical rating and diagnosis in PD patients. Using the Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) sensor, we measured the movement of finger tapping (FT), hand movements (HM), and rapid alternating movements (RA) in 25 PD patients and 21 healthy controls. Through the analysis of the measured signal, 11 objective features were derived. In addition, a clinician who specializes in movement disorders viewed the test video and evaluated each of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. In all items of FT, HM, RA, the correlation between the linear regression score obtained through objective features (angle, period, coefficient variances for angle and period, change rates of angle and period, angular velocity, total angle, frequency, magnitude, and frequency × magnitude) and the clinician's UPDRS score was analyzed, and there was a significant correlation (rho > 0.7, p < 0.001). PD patients and controls were classified by deep learning using objective features. As a result, it showed a high performance with an area under the curve (AUC) about as high as 0.9 (FT Total = 0.950, HM Total = 0.889, RA Total = 0.888, ALL Total = 0.926. This showed similar performance to the classification result of binary logistic regression and neurologist, and significantly higher than that of family medicine specialists. Our results suggest that the deep learning model using objective features from the IMU sensor can be usefully used to identify and evaluate bradykinesia, especially for general physicians not specializing in neurology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33507401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.