ArticleExperimental brain research2021
Exploring the cognitive demands required for young adults to adjust online obstacle avoidance strategies.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of blood flow restriction combined with low-load resistance training on obstacle-crossing performance and lower limb function in older adults.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Presentation of multiple task instructional sets impacts auditory Stroop performance during dual task locomotion.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Exploring the challenges of avoiding collisions with virtual pedestrians using a dual-task paradigm in individuals with chronic moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Dual Tasking during Trip Recovery and Obstacle Clearance among Young, Healthy Adults in Human Factors Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans integrate visual information about their surrounding environment to properly adapt their locomotion to step over or around obstacles in their path. We know that cognition aids in the execution of locomotion and in complex maneuvers such as obstacle avoidance. However, the role of the cognitive system in performing online adjustments to an obstacle avoidance strategy during locomotion has not yet been elucidated. Nineteen young adults instrumented with kinematic markers were asked to step over or circumvent an obstacle to the left or right. In half of these trials, participants were required to adjust this strategy when cued by LED lights two steps prior to obstacle crossing. In 75% of trials, a cognitive task was simultaneously presented (incongruent or congruent auditory Stroop cue, or neutral cue). Center of mass position and velocity was estimated and gait metrics (eg. step length) were calculated to quantify how individuals performed this last-minute direction change and determine how these responses changed when simultaneously performing a cognitive task. Results showed statistically shorter crossing steps, where the trailing limb was placed further from the leading edge and the lead limb was placed closer to the trailing edge when responding to the auditory Stroop task. Performing these avoidance strategy changes also decreased cognitive task performance. Our findings suggest that visually integrating a new stepping pattern to cross an obstacle is a complex locomotor maneuver, and requires the aid of the cognitive system to be performed effectively in a young adult population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33507351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.