ReviewDer Internist2021
[Interventional treatment of high blood pressure-Current state].
Review in Der Internist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arterial hypertension is a real global burden with a very high prevalence. In the last decades, many pharmaceutical approaches have been successfully developed for treating hypertension. Currently, novel medications for influencing blood pressure are not in sight. In recent years alternatives, such as interventional procedures for reducing blood pressure, have been developed and tested. Ablation of the renal sympathetic nerves (renal denervation, RDN), which are wrapped around the renal arteries in particular, has been intensively investigated as a procedure. After the first RDN studies a clear influence on the blood pressure could be shown; however, in the first sham-controlled studies the reduction in blood pressure by RDN could no longer consistently be shown. In very systematic sham-controlled, blinded studies in patients with hypertension but without medication a robust blood pressure reducing effect of RDN could be shown, which corresponded to the effect of a blood pressure-reducing drug. It is obvious that larger studies and also long-term studies have to sustainably confirm this effect. In recent years, active and passive stimulation of the baroreceptors could also be established as a blood pressure reducing principle, at least in studies but the evidence is still very low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.