ArticleDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2021
[Standard of patient-centred care before admission to a university wound centre].
Article in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defining Wound Care Learning Objectives for Medical Students: A Multidisciplinary Comparison of Expert and Practitioner Perspectives.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Experts Teaching Wound Management-A Survey of Current Practices in Germany.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesHealth care for patients with chronic wounds is often protracted. This can result in decreased quality of care or delayed diagnosis of the actual cause of disease. Concurrently, there are already certified facilities for these patients. The present work investigates possible reasons for delayed referral and whether a specific selection of patients is sent to these university-based centres. PATIENTS AND
methodsA retrospective patient data chart review at the point of first admission to the certified wound centre was performed to identify concerning variables about the standard of care before university presentation.
resultsRecords of 177 patients were analysed (53% women, 47% men; patient age range 27-95 years). The mean duration of the wound was 22 months. Vascular diagnostics had already been performed in 32% (arterial diagnostics) and 36% (phlebological diagnostics), respectively. A tissue sample had been analysed in 9% of cases, especially when wound duration exceeded > 24 months. In only 45% of cases was the external diagnosis in accord with the final diagnosis in the wound centre. DISCUSSION: The health care situation for patients with chronic wounds outside of specialised care structures is insufficient. Early and standardized diagnostics and therapy and a reasonable admission to specialised centres is desired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.