Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33506670›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2021

Telephone interview in urogynecology in the era of COVID-19 pandemic

Marta Barba, Stefano Manodoro, Sara Bosio, Luca Locatelli, Matteo Frigerio

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Implementing telemedicine in urogynecology: A feasibility study.International urogynecology journal · 2023
    Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marta BarbaUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, ItalyORCID 0000-0002-7495-7185
Stefano ManodoroDepartment of Gynecology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Milano, ItalyORCID 0000-0002-1837-0806
Sara BosioUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, ItalyORCID 0000-0001-9764-8521
Luca LocatelliUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, ItalyORCID 0000-0003-2496-5715
Matteo FrigerioDepartment of Gynecology, ASST Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, ItalyORCID 0000-0003-3952-8462
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITOspedale San Paolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: During the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic deferable access, including non-urgent outpatient visits, have been suspended. In our practice non-urgent routine visits for pelvic floor symptom assessment were discontinued and rescheduled, and telephone interview was performed. The aim was to evaluate patients’ satisfaction for this alternative approach. Material and Methods: Telephone interviews were conducted using a validated questionnaire to investigate pelvic floor symptoms. Patients were also asked if they had other symptoms or disorders, to identify patients who may need urgent hospital evaluation. At the end of the phone call, patients were asked to score their satisfaction with the telephone interview by grading their response to three questions from 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). The questions were: 1) “Was the telephone interview useful to check your state of health?”; 2) “Was the telephone interview an adequate healthcare tool in consideration of COVID-19 outbreak?”; 3) “Could the telephone interview replace the conventional visit?”. Results: Fifty-three patients were evaluated. All patients showed great satisfaction with telephone interview (Q1 median: 10, IQ range: 10-10) and were similarly positive in response to the second question (Q2 median: 10, IQ range: 10-10). Although fewer patients felt that telephone interview could replace conventional clinic visits most remained positive (Q3 median: 7; IQ range: 6-8). Conclusion: This simple experience showed that phone interviews with validated questionnaires are appreciated and effective to safely perform interview of selected urogynecologic patients.

Indexed as

anti-incontinence surgeryCOVID-19female pelvic medicineprolapse surgeryTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33506670
PMCPMC7944235
OpenAlexW3124720444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.