Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33506643›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2021

Usefulness of CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for predicting incident atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients.

Yuzhong Wu, Zengshuo Xie, Weihao Liang, Ruicong Xue, Zexuan Wu, Dexi Wu, Jiangui He, Wengen Zhu, Chen Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Association Between High CHAClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuzhong WuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zengshuo XieDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Weihao LiangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Ruicong XueDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Zexuan WuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Dexi WuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jiangui HeDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Wengen ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Chen LiuDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCoexisting of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) could increase the risk of mortality. In this study, we aimed to assess the values of the CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for AF prediction in HFpEF patients. METHODS AND

resultsWe performed a retrospective analysis on symptomatic HFpEF patients in the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial. Associations of the CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores with the risk of incident AF in HFpEF patients without baseline AF (n = 2202) were assessed using the multivariable competing risk regression models. The discriminatory performances of these scores were calculated using the C-index. During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the average incidence of AF was 1.80 per 100 patient-years in HFpEF patients. When score was analysed as a continuous variable, per 1-point increase in the CHADS2 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-1.68, C-index: 0.71), R2CHADS2 (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10-1.42, C-index: 0.69), or CHA2DS2-VASc (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.16-1.46, C-index: 0.70) scores was associated with an increased risk of incident AF. When score was analysed as a categorical variable, patients with CHADS2 ≥ 3 (HR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.70-4.04), R2CHADS2 ≥ 3 (HR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.56-4.17), or CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 4 (HR = 2.54, 95% CI: 1.59-4.07) had a higher risk of incident AF compared with the corresponding controls.

conclusionsOur data first suggest that the CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores could predict the risk of incident AF in HFpEF patients with modest predictive abilities.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHeart FailureStrokeHumansPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStroke VolumeAtrial fibrillationHeart failureRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID33506643
PMCPMC8006733
OpenAlexW3125509905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.