Chicago classification version 4.0© from surgeons' point of view.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Changes in the Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders Imposed by the New Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders on High Resolution Manometry (Chicago Classification 4.0).Advances in therapy · 2021
   Article
2. NEW CLASSIFICATION FOR ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DISORDERS (CHICAGO CLASSIFICATION VERSION 4.0©) AND CHAGAS DISEASE ESOPHAGOPATHY (ACHALASIA).Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  High-resolution manometry from the surgical point of view: Response to letter to the editor.2021
• Comment on
  Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.02021

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as