Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33506440›Full record

SynthesisBrain imaging and behavior2021

The ENIGMA Brain Injury working group: approach, challenges, and potential benefits.

Elisabeth A Wilde, Emily L Dennis, David F Tate

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain imaging and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth A WildeTBICC, Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Emily L DennisTBICC, Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. emily.dennis@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7112-4009
David F TateTBICC, Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri–St. Louis · US

Funding

Longitudinal Tracking of Traumatic Brain Injury: Advanced ConnectomicsK99NS096116 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DENNIS, EMILY LARSEN · 2016 to 2017
$176k
Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium (CENC) Imaging CoreI01RX002174 · VA · MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI WILDE, ELISABETH A · 2016 to 2020
–
NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS096116RRD VA I01 RX002174US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command PT12051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) consortium brings together researchers from around the world to try to identify the genetic underpinnings of brain structure and function, along with robust, generalizable effects of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The recently-formed ENIGMA Brain Injury working group includes 10 subgroups, based largely on injury mechanism and patient population. This introduction to the special issue summarizes the history, organization, and objectives of ENIGMA Brain Injury, and includes a discussion of strategies, challenges, opportunities and goals common across 6 of the subgroups under the umbrella of ENIGMA Brain Injury. The following articles in this special issue, including 6 articles from different subgroups, will detail the challenges and opportunities specific to each subgroup.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesMental DisordersBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingENIGMAMeta-analysisSpecial issueTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID33506440
PMCPMC8035294
OpenAlexW3121904570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.