Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33506422›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Behavior of acetamiprid, azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, and lambda-cyhalothrin in/on pomegranate tissues.

Soudamini Mohapatra, Lekha Siddamallaiah, Nagapooja Yogendraiah Matadha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soudamini MohapatraPesticide Residue Laboratory, Division of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lake P.O, Bangalore, 560089, India. Soudamini_mohapatra@rediffmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-709X
Lekha SiddamallaiahPesticide Residue Laboratory, Division of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lake P.O, Bangalore, 560089, India.
Nagapooja Yogendraiah MatadhaPesticide Residue Laboratory, Division of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta Lake P.O, Bangalore, 560089, India.
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pomegranate crop is affected by several insect pests and requires usage of a large number of pesticides, but the information on their behavior in pomegranate tissues is limited. A study was conducted to assess the behavior of acetamiprid, azoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, and lambda-cyhalothrin in pomegranate fruits and leaves. The QuEChERS analytical method and LC-MS/MS and GC-MS were used for quantification of the analytes. The LOD (limit of detection) of acetamiprid, azoxystrobin, and pyraclostrobin was 0.0015 mg kg

Indexed as

Pesticide ResiduesPomegranateChromatography, LiquidFruitNeonicotinoidsNitrilesPyrethrinsPyrimidinesStrobilurinsTandem Mass SpectrometryacetamipridazoxystrobincyhalothrinNeonicotinoidsNitrilesPesticide ResiduespyrachlostrobinPyrethrinsPyrimidinesStrobilurinsBehaviorHalf-lifePesticidesPomegranateResidue

Identifiers

PMID33506422
OpenAlexW3121278005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.