Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33506375›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2021

Population Pharmacokinetics of Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, Doxorubicin and Epirubicin in Pregnant Women with Cancer: A Study from the International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP).

Julie M Janssen, Kristel Van Calsteren, Thomas P C Dorlo, Michael J Halaska, Robert Fruscio, Petronella Ottevanger, Carolien P Schröder, Ingrid Boere, Petronella O Witteveen, Rebecca C Painter and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanisms of altered hepatic drug disposition during pregnancy: small molecules.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pregnancy and Cancer: the INCIP Project.Current oncology reports · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Julie M JanssenDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kristel Van CalsterenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas P C DorloDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael J HalaskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 3rd Medical Faculty, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Robert FruscioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Petronella OttevangerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Carolien P SchröderDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ingrid BoereDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Petronella O WitteveenDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rebecca C PainterDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruud BekkersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catherina Cancer Institute, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Vit DrochytekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 3rd Medical Faculty, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jos H BeijnenDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alwin D R HuitemaDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederic C H AmantDepartment of Oncology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. f.amant@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLKU Leuven · BERadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady · CZUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on reassuring short-term foetal and maternal safety data, there is an increasing trend to administer chemotherapy during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs might change as a result of several physiological changes that occur during pregnancy, potentially affecting the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy.

objectiveWith this analysis, we aimed to quantitatively describe the changes in the PK of docetaxel, paclitaxel, doxorubicin and epirubicin in pregnant women compared with non-pregnant women.

methodsPK data from 9, 20, 22 and 16 pregnant cancer patients from the International Network of Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP) were available for docetaxel, paclitaxel, doxorubicin and epirubicin, respectively. These samples were combined with available PK data from non-pregnant patients. Empirical non-linear mixed-effects models were developed, evaluating fixed pregnancy effects and gestational age as covariates.

resultsOverall, 82, 189, 271, and 227 plasma samples were collected from pregnant patients treated with docetaxel, paclitaxel, doxorubicin and epirubicin, respectively. The plasma PK data were adequately described by the respective models for all cytotoxic drugs. Typical increases in central and peripheral volumes of distribution of pregnant women were identified for docetaxel, paclitaxel, doxorubicin and epirubicin. Additionally, docetaxel, doxorubicin and paclitaxel clearance were increased in pregnant patients, resulting in lower exposure in pregnant women compared with non-pregnant patients.

conclusionGiven the interpatient variability, the identified pregnancy-induced changes in PK do not directly warrant dose adjustments for the studied drugs. Nevertheless, these results underscore the need to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy, when administered during pregnancy.

Indexed as

InfertilityNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDocetaxelDoxorubicinEpirubicinFemaleHumansPaclitaxelPregnancyPregnant PeopleTaxoidsDocetaxelDoxorubicinEpirubicinPaclitaxelTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID33506375
OpenAlexW3122233670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.