ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021
Evaluation of microhaplotypes in forensic kinship analysis from a Swedish population perspective.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening of microhaplotypes for paternity testing from low-recombination regions in the human genome.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Mixture Deconvolution with Massively Parallel Sequencing Data: Microhaplotypes Versus Short Tandem Repeats.Genes · 2025Article
- Improved second-degree kinship analysis using the FGID forensic four-in-one DNA typing kit.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Complex kinship testing using the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Considerations for the Implementation of Massively Parallel Sequencing into Routine Kinship Analysis.Genes · 2025Article
- Developmental and validation of a novel small and high-efficient panel of microhaplotypes for forensic genetics by the next generation sequencing.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Forensic biogeographical ancestry inference: recent insights and current trends.Genes & genomics · 2023Review
- Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- A multipurpose panel of microhaplotypes for use with STR markers in casework.Forensic science international. Genetics · 2022Article
- North Asian population relationships in a global context.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The application of short and highly polymorphic microhaplotype loci in paternity testing and sibling testing of temperature-dependent degraded samples.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- The population genetics characteristics of a 90 locus panel of microhaplotypes.Human genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technology has enabled the discovery of several new types of forensic markers where microhaplotypes are one of these promising novel genetic markers. Microhaplotypes are, commonly, less than 300 nucleotides in length and consist of two or more closely linked single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In this study, we have examined a custom-made QIAseq Microhaplotype panel (Qiagen), including 45 different microhaplotype loci. DNA libraries were prepared according to the GeneRead DNAseq Targeted Panels V2 library preparation workflow (Qiagen) and sequenced on a MiSeq FGx instrument (Verogen). We evaluated the performance of the panel based on 75 samples of Swedish origin and haplotype frequencies were established. We performed sensitivity studies and could detect haplotypes at input amounts down to 0.8 ng. We also studied mixture samples with two contributors for which haplotypes, for the minor contributor, were detectable down to the level of 1:100. Furthermore, we executed kinship simulations to evaluate the usefulness of this panel in kinship analysis. The results showed that both paternity and full sibling cases can clearly be solved. When simulating a half sibling versus unrelated case scenario, there were, however, some overlap of the likelihood ratio distributions potentially resulting in inconclusiveness. To conclude, the results of this initial study are promising for further implementation of this microhaplotype assay into the forensic field, although we noticed some primer design issues that could be optimized, which possibly would increase the power of the assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.