Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33506208›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

An updated histology recode for the analysis of primary malignant and nonmalignant brain and other central nervous system tumors in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

Gonçalo Forjaz, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Carol Kruchko, Rebecca Siegel, Serban Negoita, Quinn T Ostrom, Lois Dickie, Jennifer Ruhl, Alison Van Dyke, Nirav Patil and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nano-Based Technology in Glioblastoma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gonçalo ForjazDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8855-2042
Jill S Barnholtz-SloanCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6190-9304
Carol KruchkoCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7212-035X
Rebecca SiegelSurveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Serban NegoitaDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Quinn T OstromCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3469-7558
Lois DickieDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer RuhlDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Alison Van DykeDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8591-9467
Nirav PatilCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8593-423X
Gino CioffiCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.
Kimberly D MillerSurveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kristin WaiteCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois, USA.
Angela B MariottoDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are over 100 histologically distinct types of primary malignant and nonmalignant brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Our study presents recent trends in the incidence of these tumors using an updated histology recode that incorporates major diagnostic categories listed in the

methodsWe used data from the SEER-21 registries for patients of all ages diagnosed in 2000-2017. We calculated age-adjusted incidence rates and fitted a joinpoint regression to the observed data to estimate the Annual Percent Change and 95% confidence intervals over the period 2000-2017.

resultsThere were 315,184 new malignant (34.2%; 107,890) and nonmalignant (65.8%; 207,294) brain tumor cases during 2004-2017. Nonmalignant meningioma represented 46.5% (146,498) of all brain tumors (malignant and nonmalignant), while glioblastoma represented 50.8% (54,832) of all malignant tumors. Temporal trends were stable or declining except for nonmalignant meningioma (0.7% per year during 2004-2017). Several subtypes presented decreases in trends in the most recent period (2013-2017): diffuse/anaplastic astrocytoma (-1.3% per year, oligodendroglioma (-2.6%), pilocytic astrocytoma (-3.8%), and malignant meningioma (-5.9%).

conclusionsDeclining trends observed in our study may be attributable to recent changes in diagnostic classification and the coding practices stemming from those changes. The recode used in this study enables histology reporting to reflect the changes. It also provides a first step toward the reporting of malignant and nonmalignant brain and other CNS tumors in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program by clinically relevant histology groupings.

Indexed as

brain tumorsclassificationsincidencetrends

Identifiers

PMID33506208
PMCPMC7813198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.