ArticleJournal of cognition2021
Why Does Dual-Tasking Hamper Implicit Sequence Learning?
Article in Journal of cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auditory sequence learning with degraded input: children with cochlear implants ('nature effect') compared to children from low and high socio-economic backgrounds ('nurture effect').Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Task integration and anticipation in complex, continuous motor tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Can frequent long stimulus onset ansynchronies (SOAs) foster the representation of two separated task-sets in dual-tasking?Psychological research · 2024Article
- Task integration in complex, bimanual sequence learning tasks.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Kinesthetic vs. visual focus: No evidence for effects of practice modality in representation types after action imagery practice and action execution practice.Human movement science · 2023Article
- A Gestalt account of human behavior is supported by evidence from switching between single and dual actions.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Element-level features in conjoint episodes in dual-tasking.Psychological research · 2023Article
- Time course of learning sequence representations in action imagery practice.Human movement science · 2023Article
- Learning of across- and within-task contingencies modulates partial-repetition costs in dual-tasking.Psychological research · 2022Article
- The State-of-the-art of Research into Human Multitasking: An Editorial.Journal of cognition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on the limitations of dual-tasking might profit from using setups with a predictable sequence of stimuli and responses and assessing the acquisition of this sequence. Detrimental effects of dual-tasking on implicit sequence learning in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.