Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33506143›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Reirradiation for Locoregional Recurrent Breast Cancer.

Sayeh Fattahi, Safia K Ahmed, Sean S Park, Ivy A Petersen, Dean A Shumway, Bradley J Stish, Elizabeth S Yan, Nicholas B Remmes, Robert W Mutter, Kimberly S Corbin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of normal tissue complications in breast cancer re-irradiation: a meta-analysis study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. FLASH proton reirradiation, with or without hypofractionation, reduces chronic toxicity in the normal murine intestine, skin, and bone.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Hype or hope? A review of challenges in balancing tumor control and treatment toxicity in breast cancer from the perspective of the radiation oncologist.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  17. Pattern of practice of re-irradiation for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in Italy: a survey by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sayeh FattahiMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Safia K AhmedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sean S ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ivy A PetersenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Dean A ShumwayMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Bradley J StishDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Elizabeth S YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nicholas B RemmesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Robert W MutterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kimberly S CorbinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReirradiation poses a distinct therapeutic challenge owing to risks associated with exceeding normal tissue tolerances and possibly more therapeutically resistant disease biology. We report our experience with reirradiation for locoregional recurrent or second primary breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1999 and 2019, all patients with breast cancer treated with repeat breast/chest wall radiation therapy (RT) at our institution were identified. Adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney rank-sum, and unpaired

resultsSeventy-two patients underwent reirradiation. Median prior RT dose, reirradiation dose, and cumulative dose were 60 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 50-60.4 Gy), 45 Gy (IQR, 40-50 Gy), and 103.54 Gy

conclusionsReirradiation for locoregional recurrent breast cancer is feasible with acceptable rates of toxicity. Disease control and survival are promising among curative intent reirradiation patients without gross disease.

Identifiers

PMID33506143
PMCPMC7814100
OpenAlexW3117452838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.