ArticleAnnals of global health2021
An In-Person and Telemedicine "Hybrid" System to Improve Cross-Border Critical Care in COVID-19.
Article in Annals of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tele-ICU platform model: point of care equipment telemetry and real-time remote critical assistance.Critical care science · 2026Article
- Use of Digital Health Interventions for Cancer Prevention Among People Living With Disabilities in the United States: A Scoping Review.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Telemedicine and the European Health Data Space: a new paradigm for healthcare in the EU.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Health impact of borders: general reflections and a case study from the Polish-German border.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Hospitals' Collaborations Strengthen Pandemic Preparedness: Lessons Learnt from COVID-19.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Utilization of telehealth services in low- and middle-income countries amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative summary.Global health action · 2023Review
- Telemedicine, Telepsychiatry and COVID-19 Pandemic: Future Prospects for Global Health.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Impact of Digital Health Transformation Driven by COVID-19 on Nursing Practice: Systematic Literature Review.JMIR nursing · 2022Review
- Telemedicine Intensive Care Unit (Tele-ICU) Implementation During COVID-19: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2022Article
- Virtual Infection Prevention and Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022Review
- Implementation of initiatives designed to improve healthcare worker health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: comparative case studies from 13 healthcare provider organisations globally.Globalization and health · 2022Article
- Delphi Consensus Study on Technical Skills for Doctor-to-Doctor Telemedicine Conferences and Consultations in Asia.Telemedicine reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: UC San Diego Health System (UCSDHS) is an academic medical center and integrated care network in the US-Mexico border area of California contiguous to the Mexican Northern Baja region. The COVID-19 pandemic deeply influenced UCSDHS activities as new public health challenges increasingly related to high population density, cross-border traffic, economic disparities, and interconnectedness between cross-border communities, which accelerated development of clinical collaborations between UCSDHS and several border community hospitals - one in the US, two in Mexico - as high volumes of severely ill patients overwhelmed hospitals. Objective: We describe the development, implementation, feasibility, and acceptance of a novel critical care support program in three community hospitals along the US-Mexico border. Methods: We created and instituted a hybrid critical care program involving: 1) in-person activities to perform needs assessments of equipment and supplies and hands-on training and education, and 2) creation of a telemedicine-based (Tele-ICU) service for direct patient management and/or consultative, education-based experiences. We collected performance metrics surrounding adherence to evidence-based practices and staff perceptions of critical care delivery. Findings: In-person intervention phase identified and filled gaps in equipment and supplies, and Tele-ICU program promoted adherence to evidence-based practices and improved staff confidence in caring for critically ill COVID-19 patients at each hospital. Conclusion: A collaborative, hybrid critical care program across academic and community centers is feasible and effective to address cross-cultural public health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.