ArticlePeerJ2021
In vitro anticandidal activity and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) screening of
Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multivariate Chemoprospecting of Five Ethnobotanically Important Himalayan Lichens Identifies Parmotrema austrosinense as a Promising Source of Phenolic Antioxidants.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Biological Effect of Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Derived fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Evaluation of anticandidal activities and phytochemical examination of extracts prepared from Vitex agnus-castus: a possible alternative in treating candidiasis infections.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2022Article
- Component Composition and Biological Activity of Various Extracts ofInternational journal of biomaterials · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCandida infections are becoming more drug resistant; it is necessary to search for alternative medications to treat them. Therefore, the present study estimates the anticandidal activity of
methodsWe used the agar well diffusion method to assess the anticandidal activity of three different VA-C leaf extracts (ethanol, methanol, and water) against three
resultsAll VA-C extracts ethanol, methanol, and water were significantly inhibited the growth of the test
conclusionsVA-C leaf extracts may be useful alternatives to anticandidal drugs, based on their effectiveness against all test
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.