ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Psychophysical Validation of a Novel Active Learning Approach for Measuring the Visual Acuity Behavioral Function.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling to Enhance Statistical Inference on Contrast Sensitivity.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Quantifying the Functional Relationship Between Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Function.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Visual Function and Driving Performance Under Different Lighting Conditions in Older Drivers: Preliminary Results From an Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Quantification of expected information gain in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity tests.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Quantification of Expected Information Gain in Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Tests.Research square · 2023Article
- Collective endpoint of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function from hierarchical Bayesian joint modeling.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Quantifying Uncertainty of the Estimated Visual Acuity Behavioral Function With Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Do Impairments in Visual Functions Affect Skiing Performance?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Validation and Repeatability of Differential Light Sensitivity Measurements with the Novel MAIA Microperimetry Device.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the quantitative visual acuity (qVA) method in measuring the visual acuity (VA) behavioral function. Methods: We evaluated qVA performance in terms of the accuracy, precision, and efficiency of the estimated VA threshold and range in Monte Carlo simulations and a psychophysical experiment. We also compared the estimated VA threshold from the qVA method with that from the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) and Freiburg Visual Acuity Text (FrACT) methods. Four repeated measures with all three methods were conducted in four Bangerter foil conditions in 14 eyes. Results: In both simulations and psychophysical experiment, the qVA method quantified the full acuity behavioral function with two psychometric parameters (VA threshold and VA range) with virtually no bias and with high precision and efficiency. There was a significant correlation between qVA estimates of VA threshold and range in the psychophysical experiment. In addition, qVA threshold estimates were highly correlated with those from the E-ETDRS and FrACT methods. Conclusions: The qVA method can provide an accurate, precise, and efficient assessment of the full acuity behavioral function with both VA threshold and range. Translational Relevance: The qVA method can accurately, precisely, and efficiently assess the full VA behavioral function. Further research will evaluate the potential value of these rich measures for both clinical research and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.