ArticleJournal of dental sciences2020
Evaluation of microleakage in class-II bulk-fill composite restorations.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of composite resin type and curing method on the fracture resistance of class II restorations: An in vitro comparison.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2025Article
- In vitro study on the bacteriostatic effect of Amoxicillin-loaded Nano-hydroxyapatite and its capability in occluding dentinal tubules.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Assessment of Microleakage in Various Bulkfill Flowable Composites: AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Impact of acid and laser etching of enamel on microleakage in different adhesive systems.Lasers in medical science · 2024Article
- A Review on the Current State of Microcapsule-Based Self-Healing Dental Composites.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Influence of chlorhexidine dentin disinfection on universal adhesive performance: Interfacial adaptation and bond strength assessments.PloS one · 2024Article
- Noninvasive Adaptation Appraisal of Antimicrobial Nano-Filled Composite.International dental journal · 2023Article
- A comparative study on microleakage of two low shrinkage composite materials in Class II cavities: A stereomicroscopic analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry : JCDArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeDespite the clinical appeal of restoring deep class II cavities in single increment using bulk-fill resin composite, sealing of bulk-filled composite restorations is a concern. This study evaluated interfacial adaptation of bulk-fill composite restoration to axial wall and gingival floor of class II cavities using cross-polarization optical coherence tomography (CP-OCT). MATERIALS AND
methodsBox-shaped class II cavities were prepared in extracted molars and divided into three groups (
resultsMann-Whitney U test showed statistically significant difference in microleakage percentage between the groups at both axial wall and gingival floor (
conclusionAll tested groups exhibited different extent of interfacial microleakage, however, two-step self-etch adhesive yielded superior adaptation in comparison to one-step self-etch adhesive and universal adhesive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.