ArticleJournal of dental sciences2020
Bibliometric analysis of the top-100 cited articles on oral potentially malignant disorders to guide research topic and direction.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping the landscape of oral cancer research trends: a systematic scientometric review of global efforts.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Pooled it
- A scientometric study on research trends and characteristics of oral leukoplakia and oral lichen planus.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Research trend of lung cancer epigenetics research: Bibliometric and visual analysis of top-100 cited documents.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of top-cited articles in Journal of Dental Sciences.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- Oral potentially malignant disorder research in Taiwan and mainland China: A scientometric analysis.Journal of dental sciences · 2022Article
- Oral cancer research in Taiwan and mainland China: Scientometric analysis with emphasis on distinctive characteristics.Journal of dental sciences · 2022Article
- Microenvironment in Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: Multi-Dimensional Characteristics and Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Bibliometric analysis of articles published in journal of dental sciences from 2009 to 2020.Journal of dental sciences · 2022Article
- Bibliometric analysis of research trends and characteristics of drug-induced gingival overgrowth.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- An update of oral potentially malignant disorders and their malignant transformation into oral cancers in Taiwan.Journal of dental sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeBibliometric analysis highlights the key topics and studies which have shaped the understanding and management of a concerned disease. Here the top-cited articles on oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) were characterized and analyzed. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive search was performed and identified in the Scopus database from 1941 to 10 March 2019 for the 100 most-cited articles on OPMD.
resultsThe number of citations of the 100 selected articles varied from 131 to 1422, with a mean of 240.6 citations per article. Molecular markers/targets, chemoprevention, and early detection and diagnosis of oral cancer were the top-3 study topics, and the proportion of the number of the articles on the top-3 topics and that of the number of citations was 47% and 47.7%, respectively. Moreover, 20 (90.9%) of the 22 high-quality articles published in journals with high IF > 9 were the research of top-3 topics. Besides, the most contributing author, Hong WK (n = 11), was from the most contributing institution and country of origin, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (n = 12), United States (n = 41). Systematic reviews (n = 7), randomized controlled trial (n = 5), cohort studies (n = 18) were study designs with higher evidence level, but the large majority (n = 70) were considered lower level.
conclusionThe results of this first citation analysis of the 100 most-cited articles on OPMD provide a historical perspective and key topics, and suggest a troika for the trends of further research and clinical practice in the field of OPMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.