ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2020
[Bronchial dilatations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a Tunisian center: effect on disease progression and prognosis].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionbronchial dilations (BDs) seem to have a major role in the natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of BDs on the severity and progression of COPD as well as on patients' prognosis.
methodswe conducted a retrospective, single-center, analytical study over the period 1995- 2017. The study was based on data from the medical records of patients with COPD who had undergone chest CT scan during the follow-up period. We compared two groups (G) of patients: G1: COPD with BDs; G2: COPD without BDs.
resultsour study included 466 patients with COPD. Among them 101 (21.6%) had BDs associated with COPD. G1 patients had lower maximum expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (G1: 1.21 L, G2: 1.37 L, p = 0.015), lower forced vital capacity (FVC) (p = 0.014), a lower PaO2 at steady state (p = 0.049), a higher rate of acute exacerbations (AE) per year (G1: 3.31, G2: 2.44, p = 0.001) and a higher rate of hospitalizations in the Intensive Care Unit per year (p = 0.02). G1 patients with AE receiving treatment in hospital had lower PaO2 3) on admission (G1: 60 mmHg, G2: 63.7 mmHg, p = 0.02 G2: 63.7 mmHg, p = 0.023), more elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) levels (p = 0.001) and were characterized by a higher use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) (p = 0.044) and invasive mechanical ventilation (p = 0.011). G2 patients had better overall survival (p = 0.002).
conclusionbronchial dilatations are an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, expecially because of the higher rate and severity of exacerbations, airway obstructions and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.