Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33505520›Full record

ArticleStrategies in trauma and limb reconstruction

Use of the Humeral Head as a Reference Point to Prevent Axillary Nerve Damage during Proximal Fixation of Humeral Fractures: An Anatomical and Radiographic Study.

H P Theeuwes, J W Potters, Jhjm Bessems, A J Kerver, G J Kleinrensink

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurologic Complications in Shoulder Surgery: Anatomy, Mechanisms, and Surgical Recommendations.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H P TheeuwesDepartment of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC Anatomy and Research Program, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J W PottersDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC Anatomy and Research Program, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jhjm BessemsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC Anatomy and Research Program, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A J KerverDepartment of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC Anatomy and Research Program, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
G J KleinrensinkDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC Anatomy and Research Program, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment of proximal humeral fractures with plate osteosynthesis or intramedullary nail fixation in humeral shaft fractures with a proximal locking bolt carries the risk of iatrogenic injury of the axillary nerve. The purpose of this anatomical study is to define a more reliable safe zone to prevent iatrogenic axillary nerve injury using the humeral head instead of the acromion as a (radiographic) reference point during operative treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsAnatomical dissection and labeling of the axillary nerve and branches was performed on 10 specially embalmed human specimens. Standard AP and straight lateral radiographs were made. The distances were measured indirectly from the cranial tip of the humerus to the axillary nerve on radiographs.

resultsThe median distance from the cranial tip of the humerus to the axillary nerve was 52 mm. The mean number of axillary nerve branches was 3. The distances from the cranial tip of the humerus to the nerve (branch) varied from 23 to 78 mm. The median distance from the proximal (anterior) branch was 36 mm, to the second branch 47 mm, 54 mm to the third branch and 73 mm to the fourth branch. The axillary nerve moves along with the humerus in cranial and caudal direction when the subacromial space varies.

conclusionThis study shows that the position of the axillary nerve can be better determent using the cranial tip of the humerus as a reference point instead of the acromion. Furthermore, it is unsafe to place the proximal locking bolts in the zone between 24 mm and 78 mm from the cranial tip of the humerus. The greatest chance to cause a lesion of the main branch of the axillary nerve is in the zone between 48 mm and 58 mm caudal from the tip of the humeral head. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Theeuwes HP, Potters JW, Bessems JHJM,

Indexed as

Axillary nerve damageProximal humeral fractureQuadrilateral spaceRadiographySafe zoneSurgical anatomyTrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID33505520
PMCPMC7801902
OpenAlexW3120616222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.