Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33505376›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020

Lukas Bernauer, Astrid Radkohl, Leonie Gabriela Katharina Lehmayer, Anita Emmerstorfer-Augustin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pichia pastoris RNA-Sequencing and Data Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Engineering small peptide secretion inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Global conformations ofScience advances · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Production of high-affinity glycosylated anti-mouse conjugated nanobodies inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lukas BernauerInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
Astrid RadkohlInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
Leonie Gabriela Katharina LehmayerInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.
Anita Emmerstorfer-AugustinInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

chromosome structureCRISPR/Cas9Komagataella phaffiimatingmethylotrophic yeastpexophagyPichia pastorisyeast genetics

Identifiers

PMID33505376
PMCPMC7829337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.