Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33505045›Full record

ArticleCurrent anthropology2019

"We Don't Need a Swab in Our Mouth to Prove Who We Are": Identity, Resistance, and Adaptation of Genetic Ancestry Testing among Native American Communities.

Jessica W Blanchard, Simon Outram, Gloria Tallbull, Charmaine D M Royal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current anthropology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing.Journal of community genetics · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica W BlanchardCenter for Applied Social Research at the University of Oklahoma (5 Partners Place, 201 Stephenson Parkway, Suite 4100, Norman, Oklahoma 73072, USA).
Simon OutramCenter on Genomics, Race, Identity, Difference (GRID) of the Social Science Research Institute (SSRI) at Duke University (2024 West Main Street, Erwin Square Mill Building, Bay C, Suite C103, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA).
Gloria TallbullCenter for Applied Social Research at the University of Oklahoma (5 Partners Place, 201 Stephenson Parkway, Suite 4100, Norman, Oklahoma 73072, USA).
Charmaine D M RoyalDepartments of African and African American Studies and Biology at Duke University (234 Friedl Building, Box 90252, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA).
University of Oklahoma · USAfrican Union · ETClinical Research Institute · US

Funding

Trust and Mistrust in American Indian and Alaska Native CommunitiesRM1HG009042 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI SPICER, PAUL G · 2016 to 2024
$8.5M
Public Perspectives and Experience Regarding Genetic Ancestry TestingR01HG006295 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ROYAL, CHARMAINE DAWN MARIE · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006295NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG009042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic ancestry testing (GAT) provides a specific type of knowledge about ancestry not previously available to the general public, prompting questions about the conditions whereby genetic articulations of ancestry present opportunities to forge new identities and social ties but also new challenges to the maintenance of existing social structures and cultural identities. The opportunities and challenges posed by GAT are particularly significant for many indigenous communities-whose histories are shaped by traumatic interactions with colonial powers and Western science-and for whom new applications of GAT may undermine or usurp long-standing community values, systems of governance, and forms of relationality. We conducted 13 focus groups with 128 participants and six in-depth, semistructured interviews with a variety of community leaders examining the perceptions of GAT within indigenous communities across Oklahoma. Our interviews and focus groups suggest that participants-through the articulation of indigeneity as experiential and relational in nature and inherently distinct from genetic notions of ancestry-resist much of the challenge presented by GAT in usurping traditional forms of identity while at the same time recognizing the utility of the technology for tracing unknown ancestry and identifying health risks in the community.

Identifiers

PMID33505045
PMCPMC7837598
OpenAlexW2969150407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.