Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33504974›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2021

The use of hyperpolarised

Ramona Woitek, Ferdia A Gallagher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Clinical Translation of HyperpolarizedAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Quo Vadis HyperpolarizedZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Efficient Parahydrogen-InducedJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. HyperpolarizedRadiology. Imaging cancer · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Deuterium Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deuterated Water-Induced 2H-Tissue Labeling Allows Monitoring Cancer Treatment at Clinical Field Strength.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ramona WoitekDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Rw585@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9146-9159
Ferdia A GallagherDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4784-5230

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16628Cancer Research UK 27150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic reprogramming is one of the hallmarks of cancer and includes the Warburg effect, which is exhibited by many tumours. This can be exploited by positron emission tomography (PET) as part of routine clinical cancer imaging. However, an emerging and alternative method to detect altered metabolism is carbon-13 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following injection of hyperpolarised [1-

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbon IsotopesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsCarbon-13Carbon Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID33504974
PMCPMC8007617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.