Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33504633›Full record

Trial reportOpen heart2021

Sex disparities in the presentation, management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the ACS QUIK trial.

Haitham Khraishah, Barrak Alahmad, Abdulhamied Alfaddagh, Sun Young Jeong, Njambi Mathenge, Mohamad Bassam Kassab, Dhaval Kolte, Erin D Michos, Mazen Albaghdadi

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open heart, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guidelines for in vivo mouse models of myocardial infarction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Gender-based differences among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients in Egypt: secondary analysis from the ACCA-EAPCI ESC-STEMI registry.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Global Perspective.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haitham KhraishahDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA hkhraish@bidmc.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0003-5089
Barrak AlahmadEnvironmental Health Department, T H Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abdulhamied AlfaddaghDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sun Young JeongDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Njambi MathengeDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mohamad Bassam KassabDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dhaval KolteDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Erin D MichosDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5547-5084
Mazen AlbaghdadiDivision of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsOur aim was to explore sex differences and inequalities in terms of medical management and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in a low/middle-income country (LMIC), where reports are scarce.

methodsWe examined sex differences in presentation, management and clinical outcomes in 21 374 patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Kerala, India enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement in Kerala trial. The main outcomes were the rates of in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as composite of death, reinfarction, stroke and major bleeding. We fitted log Poisson multivariate random effects models to obtain the relative risks comparing women with men, and adjusted for clustering by centre and for age, CVD risk factors and cardiac presentation.

resultsA total of 5191 (24.3%) patients were women. Compared with men, women presenting with ACS were older (65±12 vs 58±12 years; p<0.001), more likely to have hypertension and diabetes. They also had longer symptom onset to hospital presentation time (median, 300 vs 238 min; p<0.001) and were less likely to receive primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (45.9% vs 49.8% of men, p<0.001). After adjustment, women were more likely to experience in-hospital (adjusted relative risk (RR)=1.53; 95% CI 1.32 to 1.77; p<0.001) and 30-day MACE (adjusted RR=1.39; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.57, p<0.001).

conclusionWomen presenting with ACS in Kerala, India had greater burden of CVD risk factors, including hypertension and diabetes mellitus, longer delays in presentation, and were less likely to receive guideline-directed management. Women also had worse in-hospital and 30-day outcomes. Further efforts are needed to understand and reduce cardiovascular care disparities between men and women in LMICs.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRegistriesAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospital MortalityHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsTreatment Outcomeacute coronary syndromecardiac catheterisationcoronary angiographycoronary artery diseaseepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID33504633
PMCPMC7843306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.